alganet

23 ms·

481.
by alganet 1y ago
> No, nobody ever says “I’m going to higher you” People say they want to move up the corporate ladder, which implies higher, and brings a visual analogy to the phrase that is compatible with what I said. There is no adverbial expressio
482.
by alganet 1y ago
I've chosen an abstraction level that I find appropriate for several different contexts that the article might apply to, including the most obvious one (just plain restaurants). I don't have much to work with here.
483.
by alganet 1y ago
My point is that the paper has no point, the article on the paper is a stretch, and none of this is relevant in any way except creating chatter. It's useless from the research perspective. But it is a cup-holder for marketing something
484.
by alganet 1y ago
I don't know what to say. Please, read again, with a more abstract mindset this time.
485.
by alganet 1y ago
> You couldn't be more wrong. Explanation missing. > If you've ever programmed, or worked with programmers, that is not an extraordinary claim at all. One step ahead of you. I already say this is engineered to encourage beli
486.
by alganet 1y ago
Please, share the well documented evidence (media articles won't do).
487.
by alganet 1y ago
This idea that some developers have some "mental model" and others not is an extraordinary claim, and I don't see extraordinary evidence. It sounds like a good thing, right? "Wow, mental model. I want that, I want to be
488.
by alganet 1y ago
Generally: Your stuff: "I heard that...", "Leader says...", "You're like a teenager..." etc My stuff: "Traditionally...", "What is reasonable?", "I'll explain..." etc The
489.
by alganet 1y ago
> If the top 1% of companies drive the majority of VC returns, why shouldn’t the same apply to talent? Our natural egalitarian bias makes this unpalatable to accept, but the 10x engineer meme doesn’t go far enough – there are clearly peo
490.
by alganet 1y ago
You do hire remote workers, don't you? If you had to hire workers in office, would you have space and infrastructure for all of them? From my perspective, this would solve the issue. Unless you're worried about in-person north kor
491.
by alganet 1y ago
If you start thinking like this, then no one will ever feel safe. I think this kind of idea is stupid.
492.
by alganet 1y ago
You are mixing hypothetical scenarios with reality. My argument was to inform high value targets first, since they are more at risk and capable of developing a fix. I also argued for slowing down the development of technology that can help
493.
by alganet 1y ago
Sounds very convoluted. I'm sure many, many countries have botnets. I have a bunch of those countries which I consider irresponsible and wreckless in my radar, not only north korea.
494.
by alganet 1y ago
An LLM is a turk machine that plays the alphabet and the etch-and-sketch instead of chess. An "AI Agent" is the deployment of one of more LLMs together with more traditional computer technology (turing machine style) to perform ta
495.
by alganet 1y ago
So, it's a big problem that everyone should know about but do nothing except post shit on news? No, you should bother. You should bother a lot. Get in contact with the FBI, make a huge deal about it. You think one company can handle a
496.
by alganet 1y ago
> We should get rid of electricity, then. Pathetic.
497.
by alganet 1y ago
> Yet, when I step outside into the streets of New York City to grab a coffee or meet a friend for lunch, it feels downright tranquil. I think you're in for a surprise in the next few decades. EDIT: what am I even saying? The articl
498.
by alganet 1y ago
Why shouldn't they go to the FBI? I strongly recommend going to official authorities if you believe you're being duped by a foreign nation spy or conspirator. If they ignore you, it's more likely that you're not that imp
499.
by alganet 1y ago
I'm having a hard time understanding your imagined scenario. Can you please explain it better?
500.
by alganet 1y ago
It makes complete sense, it means "promotion" in that phrase. If you are going to disagree, please elaborate.
501.
by alganet 1y ago
My imagination is very expansive, I can come up with grand scopes that movies and conspiracy theorists would never dream of. Reality is much simpler though. Greed, I already said it. Typical human defects. It seems that you are not comprehe
502.
by alganet 1y ago
You miss the point. Remote working is in the same vein as offshoring. One enables the other, they're co-dependent. Both are based on greed. In the case of remote working, is avoiding having offices, avoiding paying certain kinds of ins
503.
by alganet 1y ago
Highering is an existing, valid word, and it fits the phrase. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/highering I agree that it is an unusual choice, but that doesn't mean you can assume it was a mispelling. Moreover, the
504.
by alganet 1y ago
What is your expertise? Things you know you are good at and can prove that you are good at despite any possible naysayers?
505.
by alganet 1y ago
One could say "it's a joke", without explaining it, thus, not ruining it. Also, saying some vague shit and then claiming it as a joke is very convenient. Finally, police injustice is not a subject for humor. It's no laug
506.
by alganet 1y ago
As you said, small businessess have less expertise and budget to deal with the problem. Telling your gramma she has a virus only makes her become afraid, she won't magically gain the ability to identify it. That's my whole reasoni
507.
by alganet 1y ago
Greed meets greed. Companies hiring cheap labor, being exploited in several fronts. It was a decision for several companies to spread thin their offshore hiring. They practically invited infiltrators in. Keep focused. Small companies never
508.
by alganet 1y ago
Can you elaborate more? It seems that you disagree but I'm missing the rationale behind it.
509.
by alganet 1y ago
Is your company involved in infrastructural or emerging tech in any way? Forgive my frankness, but these worries about infiltrators have priority in important, large companies. I am very sure agencies responsible for this can contact these
510.
by alganet 1y ago
Private disclosures for more sensitive vulnerabilities are a recommended practice. In your analogy, that's why I aluded to. In such cases, you only share the sensitive vulnerability publicly once there is a fix. For this case, there se

More ›