alganet

30 ms·

511.
by alganet 1y ago
It is expected that filtering based on digital content will become a thing for a while. It's one of those obvious, but misguided, uses of recent technologies. I don't know about restaurants, but in regards to other kinds of silos,
512.
by alganet 1y ago
The correct takeaway from this is not that word choice should not change. It does all the time. A pop song or a powerful speech can (and did) do that. We also should not think exclusively of whoever chooses the datasets for training LLMs as
513.
by alganet 1y ago
That's too shallow for me. This idea encourages the line of thinking that replacing whoever made AI will solve the ethical problems with using this technology, which is a wrong way of approaching it. It also encourages the idea of fixa
514.
by alganet 1y ago
I asked for viraptor's elaboration on what he thinks of it. Thanks for your perspective though.
515.
by alganet 1y ago
I think the paranoia and fear this kind of idea promotes is perhaps the point of all of it. Why this is being discussed publicly? It seems way more reasonable to inform IT companies directly, or investigate it outside media attention. Also,
516.
by alganet 1y ago
Can you elaborate a little bit more?
517.
by alganet 1y ago
This all sounds counter-productive. Free software of such magnitude could and should live only by source code contributions, not money.
518.
by alganet 1y ago
I left a job just before the first day because they shoved in a stupid image rights clause in the contract. I left a promising interview in the middle because they pretended the process was more bureaucratic than it was. I left a job that w
519.
by alganet 1y ago
Keep the discussion in the subject or get out.
520.
by alganet 1y ago
Not everything is about you. Keep your stuff away from mine.
521.
by alganet 1y ago
Giving the lack of good candidates, I'll take the lead again then, and bring back the discussion to its tracks. Trump thinks he's the US. He thinks he is the country. You (all commenters on this sub-thread alike) are playing his g
522.
by alganet 1y ago
If you understood and agreed, why did you said it was weird? If you didn't understood, why didn't you asked for clarification? It seems that what you really missed was an opportunity to engage the interaction in a healthy way. Or
523.
by alganet 1y ago
Perhaps I'm saying he trusts the Itamaraty with official information. Official diplomatic channels are the norm, not media theatrics (miles ahead of you, "do your art of the deal thing" was the first thing I said, you failed
524.
by alganet 1y ago
This is most likely because you don't understand that I was approaching the subject from the foreign relations perspective. I did gave a big hint though (mentioning the Itamaraty)! It was hard to miss, but somehow you missed it. Of cou
525.
by alganet 1y ago
I understand, it's not intentional then. I'm talking about foreign relations. That's why I mentioned the Itamaraty. You're talking about news, media, interviews, etc. You didn't noticed what my angle was, and you wa
526.
by alganet 1y ago
Nope, that's for you. I said "rumours". You jumped right in at it with more rumours and name dropping. Are you doing it because you see other people doing or do you know what you're doing?
527.
by alganet 1y ago
> “the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to the welfare of the public...” Is AI a source? It feels like this possibility was unthinkable when that decision was made. Now, it&#
528.
by alganet 1y ago
There is no such thing as AI addiction. It is a mislabelling, at best. A manufactured event, at worst.
529.
by alganet 1y ago
Are you trying to Iron Man (2008) our minds? Not very subtle.
530.
by alganet 1y ago
This is irrelevant.
531.
by alganet 1y ago
Cool! I have no use for a copy of it though. I'm estabilishing communication with future humans, using it as a time capsule.
532.
by alganet 1y ago
I have reasons to believe its logs will endure for a long time.
533.
by alganet 1y ago
Ok, good point. Good luck with the book.
534.
by alganet 1y ago
Are you trying to name drop stuff to gauge how I keep interacting with this kind of discussion? Maybe it's unconscious on your part, IDK. Do you understand what you're doing?
535.
by alganet 1y ago
It's a tradition, a way of building things. You're an artist, I'm sure you understand what art that comes from tradition tries to accomplish.
536.
by alganet 1y ago
> Looks like Rumours. I approve the Itamaraty's reaction of not acknowledging the letter and sending it back. Lacking a proper world leader, we the people must take the responsability of actually not negotiating with terrorists. We
537.
by alganet 1y ago
Nice! That's what we all want, but without the content reapropriation, surveillance and public discourse meddling. Think of a version that is even more fun, won't teach your kids wrong stuff, won't need a datacenter full of e
538.
by alganet 1y ago
This argument sounds like someone who was caught cheating and is trying to come up with weird excuses. "We agreed to never cheat, but I saw you texting a friend, therefore I can now have sex with anyone I want" It's lame.
539.
by alganet 1y ago
I'm not asking for the recipe on concentrated dark matter, this is just a casual conversation! But, by any chance, would you be willing to share the recipe on concentrated dark matter? Sure! I like posts that have hard honest work behi
540.
by alganet 1y ago
Sure. However, this was _never_ about money and _always_ about good honest work.

More ›