alganet

26 ms·

451.
by alganet 1y ago
You're upset because the nerdy boy that explains things is supposed to apologize when confronted, specially if there's any injustice involved. Now you're even more upset that I didn't, and I also did put you in the spotl
452.
by alganet 1y ago
It's ok, I don't need you to understand. It seems you're holding back. There's a lot to talk about it, and all you had to say was "why?". I gave you a chance to better explain your doubts, you didn't make
453.
by alganet 1y ago
> I think you’re quite far off No threat then. If I'm that off, why even engage? > you’ve reacted to pushback terribly Felt like the right thing to do. > It’s about questioning the fabric of your personal reality You're j
454.
by alganet 1y ago
Already explained. If you have any doubts, please quote the part that you don't understand and explain how far you got in understanding it.
455.
by alganet 1y ago
Why would I investigate the labyrinth floor if the walls are shorter than my eyesight? I feel like this is a fools errand. Let's use the marketing terms to frame this problem. Companies are saying LLMs are like "the new printing p
456.
by alganet 1y ago
Google probably should be left alone (other parties stop investigating its traffic patterns and users). It's a delicate position, either all nations should have access to its workings or none of them. Finding the right combination of m
457.
by alganet 1y ago
OK. Whatever this fight is, is not my fight (I have no fight, no need for one). Do you have anything to add regarding the contents of the movie? Now it would be a good time to speak up, demonstrating that you were not just trying to interru
458.
by alganet 1y ago
Why are you so invested in this discussion?
459.
by alganet 1y ago
No. Yes.
460.
by alganet 1y ago
Duh, it implies I don't know about magnetism , which is something I stated. What it tries to do is to provoke me to impostor my way into searching about magnetism and then repeating something that I read. And it failed at that. I&#x27
461.
by alganet 1y ago
Pie is good, beats 100-year-old sauerkraut.
462.
by alganet 1y ago
You're missing the point, but I'll entertain your misdirection for a while. The Wachowski sisters never released a Matrix movie. One of them gave up completely, the other one also almost gave up and ended up writing just a part
463.
by alganet 1y ago
I haven't said anything about magnetism. Read my comment again.
464.
by alganet 1y ago
This is likely to be less important than it really is. It reminds me of the "new state of matter discovered" kinds of articles that are known to get clicks. https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&am
465.
by alganet 1y ago
You're working as a collective consciousness. It's less impressive than it sounds. You hear stuff from one of your trusted sources, and you repeat it. When you find something that can align with your discourse, you interact. The p
466.
by alganet 1y ago
Yes, and Godzilla exists too. You're lagging behind in interpretation. Like, way behind.
467.
by alganet 1y ago
You're practically asking someone to bring Golems, Metropolis, Frankenstein. Media portrayal of AI is still to this day closer to that than to how programmers actually think. It's kind of silly. The truth is, it doesn't mat
468.
by alganet 1y ago
Agent Smith is 1/3 of Trinity. C'mon, that's right in the face. In the flanking symbolism (three figures, a central one flanked by two others), Trinity represents the flanking formation itself. Agent Smith represents one of t
469.
by alganet 1y ago
You're right, there is no novelty (despite the attempt) in social commentary there. But they give you a spoon (for you to make one yourself). I think the one that took off as the main interpretation is definitely not what the Watchowsk
470.
by alganet 1y ago
> I just realised Neo is the perfect analogy for AI becoming conscious You clearly haven't seen Animatrix then. This option is explored in one of the episodes. In my opinion, cinematically speaking, Neo is male Nova (from Planet of
471.
by alganet 1y ago
Curious! My sixth-sense is only able to detect bullshit.
472.
by alganet 1y ago
I wonder if the profession of the future won't be rogue AI hunter.
473.
by alganet 1y ago
It means nothing (musically speaking, in my opinion). Vulfpeck published an empty silence album to it and it got significant playtime due to social media antics. These worries are more related to the money aspect of music. It is a tragedy a
474.
by alganet 1y ago
Cyberpunk is a fiction probe into computer people, adopted as a pet. As long as computers exist, there will be fiction about them and people that work with them. Call it whatever you want, it doesn't matter.
475.
by alganet 1y ago
Real programmers use butterflies. https://xkcd.com/378/ --- Let me elaborate: there is a huge history of dubious allegations of what constitutes "a real programmer" or stuff that makes you "a better prog
476.
by alganet 1y ago
Prevention of bots and other kinds of automation takes precedence over any thematic changes. If that is done first, we might not need to separate subjects. HN lacks even the most basic aspects of human verification.
477.
by alganet 1y ago
> If we want to understand the human mind in its entirety, we must move from domain-specific theories to an integrated one I would prefer if first, the feasibility of a unified integrated theory was proven. > An important step towards
478.
by alganet 1y ago
"follows humans" was in your comment related to the definition of alignment. Somehow, you now disagree with yourself? Alignment is a problem of AI serving humanity for good. You can't even demonstrate that you are able to
479.
by alganet 1y ago
You're not reading correctly. Go back to my first comment, it's all there.
480.
by alganet 1y ago
Words already don't matter, way before LLMs. Know your rethoric basics.

More ›