Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
alganet
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
23 ms
·
301.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
That's a stretch. It's like saying the right to repair movement has a bonus of making cheaper phones because it introduces a point in which manufacturers can compete. It's a long set of stretches, actually. People are just us
302.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
No, it doesn't. Freedom to commercialize does not mean the movement is designed to make things cheaper.
303.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
I never said it was.
304.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
Free software has nothing to do with making services cheaper.
305.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
Well, Claude Code is sold as an easy to use magic tool. https://www.anthropic.com/claude-code > Unleash Claude’s raw power directly in your terminal. > Search million-line codebases instantly. > Turn hours-long wor
306.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
I'm puzzled by this part then: > The key thing is to develop an intuition for questions it can usefully answer vs questions that are at a level of detail where the lossiness matters. If that intuition is not explained, it's no
307.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
People don't interact with encyclopedias by chatting with them. Also, why would I want a lossy encyclopedia? Disk space is cheaper than GPUs. I can host searchable dumps of the full Wikipedia and Stack Overflow in cheap commodity hardw
308.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
Don't get me wrong, but from a relationships perspective, your comment sounds more like a frustrated spoiled ex-girlfriend than a friend. I mean, friends don't go badmouthing their friends on the internet. It's a dick move. R
309.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
That's not the definition of the scientific method. That's more like a quote from Interstellar than how science works. When you encounter an unexplained phenomena (such as an increase in cases of psychosis), you should observe fir
310.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
Did he?
311.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
I believe you are wrong. Let's say I believe in dragons, and I start interpreting any evidence as dragon evidence. Furthermore, I start only looking for evidence that could be connected to dragons. It's bad thinking. The opposite
312.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
The author has a hypothesis and it's looking for evidence, instead of looking at evidence to draw a hypothesis. It's bad thinking.
313.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
I wouldn't. It's a vulnerability to have your data somewhere else. People know this. The first actual "second brain" of some sorts is likely to be unwilling, made by someone else trying to capture the thoughts of a subje
314.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
Can you tell me a bit more about what makes it interesting for you?
315.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
What about it?
316.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
If you say so. I cannot convince you of anything else, can I?
317.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
I understand, you wanted to get close to my argument and show support. However, if you don't understand what I'm saying, maybe you should avoid it. Don't you think?
318.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
What the fuck are you talking about, my dude?
319.
▲
Ask HN: Enterpreneurs, does AI hurt you?
7 points
by
alganet
1y ago
|
2 comments
320.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
I'm not eccentric or rich, that's not my problem to solve. Good luck! Anyway, why do you think that's a problem you need to think of?
321.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
I don't understand why you would need a prefix.
322.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
I often have the impression that reddit burned cash in useless things (instead of pumping it trying to recover any investment), and they didn't even knew what they were. It happens more often than you think.
323.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
I have given it, but you don't comprehend some parts of it. The point which you are asking me to elaborate on is a discussion dead end. You are compelled to see it as an adversarial employee-employer dispute instead of a more complex d
324.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
I am confident you can find those answers on your own, exactly as I did.
325.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
I'm unemployed, so consider this as a general observation. There are many considerations both employers and employees make beyond money and time. The question is unrealistic because it forces whoever answers to choose between restric
326.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
Of course they can.
327.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
Don't take it personally.
328.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
That's not my problem.
329.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
I prefer 100% more time and 100% more money. This is an unrealistic question, it deserves an unrealistic answer.
330.
▲
by
alganet
1y ago
You made it personal: you left it because you don't like it anymore. I am not talking about that kind of thinking. I totally understand why you would be encouraged to think that everyone that does it would do it for the same reason
More ›