Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
alexvoda
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
51 ms
·
841.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
What are you talking about? You consider "the science" to be e phenomenon? What does that even mean? Also, plenty of people who are (voluntarily or involuntarily) spreading FUD are not directly telling others to do or not do somet
842.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
TFA is actually written by him. This discredits WSJ Oppinon as a valid source of information. If as a journalism agency you do not bother to ban obvious quacks, you do not deserve to be listened to.
843.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
> [1] The end of the article mentions "Dr. Montagnier was a winner of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for discovering the human immunodeficiency virus." This f*** again. That is all I need to know about that arti
844.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
Humorlessly debunking stuff is necessary when the group of people confusing fiction with reality grows. Unfortunately there is plenty of humorless debunking to be done until humanity can safely engage in fiction without having said fiction
845.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
Matt Levine ExcelCoin is trending. Buy now!
846.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
I find this atricle to be rather hollow basing rather big claims on just the success of AlphaFold and Facebook's ability to manipulate people. Scientific theories will continue to be the pillar of scientific understanding. Just because
847.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
Yunohn, you are the one who used the term "the science" which you consider controlled by corporate interests. Mellavora's anger at your comment is justified since at the very least you were directly accusing them of being com
848.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
If you would of made this comment in the 70's or 80's you would have been called a commie bastard. You manage in just two sentences to conflate 3 different notions into one single "bad thing ™": science, capitalism and d
849.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
I remember when that article was trening on HN. I wonder how supported by data that article is, because if it is scientific it would be a wonderful quick and easy reply to people using autism and the spectrum for various arguments. Higher r
850.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
That looks cool, but I do not see it featured on Relativity's website and their pricing page is the "contact sales" kind. IOW, this is irrelevant for individuals.
851.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
I do agree that structuring this as a print journal is pointless and a relic if a past era. This should be something implemented using something like science-octopus.org or osf.io
852.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
I agree that phrasing it like that invites misinterpretation. And when publishing on a subject with as much disinformation as this, it is your duty to be as clear and precise as possible in order to avoid misinterpretations and being misquo
853.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
Location: Romania, Bucharest or Brasov Remote: Yes (Preferred) Willing to relocate: No Willing to travel for work: Yes(depending on the country) Technologies: - Languages: Solidity, SQL, C#, Powershell, F#, Rust, Types
854.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
Example of sounds that are very useful: - device connected - device disconnected
855.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
How can you still be an anthropic climate change denier in 2022? Batteries might not be eco-friendly, but they are reciclable and meanwhile global warming is the more urgent and grave issue. The alternative is you are a troll.
856.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
True words you speak
857.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
I read the entire link you posted. The conclusion presented lacks nuance. But other than that I see no issue with that debunking. Even drawing that conclusion is understandable at the time it was initially published. But I agree, the conclu
858.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
Remember that the ones spreading this theory before any evidence of any kind, were very much pushing a biowarfare angle. They still are but now they are more diluted ammong the larger group supporting a lab leak theory. The conspiracy theor
859.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
I do not understand why this solution is dismissed. A carbon tax results in: - encouraging development of carbon capture and storage - encouraging development of carbon neutral fuel synthesis (Elon needs this for Mars) - the two above encou
860.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
What are Fungible Non-FungibleTokens supposed to mean?
861.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
Not sure a centralised entity is desirable vs a distributed network. And platforms for distributed networks do exist (1), (2). The issue is incentives for switching and reaching critical mass. (1) https://blog.science-octopus.org
862.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
Entirely agree, we should find ways to reliably support upstream. But that is a different issue, and unfortunately it is one that the main beneficiaries are not willing to solve. Forking solves the issue of an upstream dependency not willin
863.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
You can not force your dependencies to do what you want. You can only patch the problem for yourself and maintain that patch in the build system, or you can fork each dependency in the chain, maintain those and then your build system is cle
864.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
Kids these days and their toys. You've never programmed until you program in assambler. Only than can you start contemplating the path to true mastery, imputting software into tha machine as binary using switches.
865.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
For the same reason I find the grammar of Kakoune a lot easier to understand. It is similarly subject first instead of predicate first. I wish there was a NeoKak that would integrate with other environments like VS Code the way NeoVim does.
866.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
The alternative would be a journal/platform/wiki/repository of only reproducible results. Only double, triple, quadruple checked results would be accepted. In physics I believe this is called being above a certain value of si
867.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
While true that reproducibility is the truly useful filter, peer review is still a valid pre-filter. Do you believe peer review suffers from both false positives and false negatives (type I and II errors, don't remember which is which)
868.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
We should strive to make reporting so easy and painless it is routine. I believe this together with finding ways to increase trust is the only way to decrease the first type of under-reporting.
869.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
You should report it, even if it was mild. Databases like VAERS and EudraVigilence do indeed suffer from both under-reporting (due to patient apathy, and other reasons) and over-reporting (by design, even events with unrelated caused are i
870.
▲
by
alexvoda
5y ago
At no point are the anti-vax websites a valid source of information. Every time I stumbled upon such a website they were blatantly lying even when linking to sources stating the opposite of their narrative. All such websites I have encounte
More ›