alexk307

5 ms·

31.
by alexk307 7mo ago
In the reference period 1999->2020, the instruments used by NHANES to track this data changed at least 3 times, they don't account for other changes to the general population that increase bicarbonate levels in serum (i.e. Number of
32.
by alexk307 1y ago
> As climate breakdown accelerates, rainfall patterns are changing fast, and water will increasingly become less available at certain times of year. As Sir David King, a former UK chief scientific adviser who chairs the Climate Crisis Ad
33.
by alexk307 1y ago
Not according to the IPCC: > Climate models consistently project environmental changes that would support an increase in the frequency and intensity of severe thunderstorms that combine tornadoes, hail, and winds (high confidence), but t
34.
by alexk307 1y ago
But that's not what the paper says. It says Clear Air Turbulence (CAT) has gotten worse, not all types of turbulence. In this case, the flight flew through a convective storm. Even so, the paper says there's been a 0.2-0.3% change
35.
by alexk307 1y ago
That paper has nothing to do with the incident in question. You're referencing a BBC article that references a paper stating that Clear Air Turbulence is getting worse [1] > Turbulence is unpleasant to fly through in an aircraft. St
36.
by alexk307 1y ago
But I was told that it was solely Climate Change that was responsible for these price hikes and that it was only going to get worse: - https://www.nbcnews.com/business/consumer/coffee-costs-clima... - https:&#x2F
37.
by alexk307 2y ago
Great! Now I'll just wait 10 years and pay double the price to get this in the US...
38.
by alexk307 2y ago
Here's ACE since 1851: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/ace-north-atlantic-hurric...
39.
by alexk307 2y ago
But that's absurd to think that you can make claims about the climate based off of a few years worth of data. Multidecadal variance is part of the climate system. Hurricanes in the US are basically flat [1][2][3]. The past thousand yea
40.
by alexk307 2y ago
I understand the concept, but please show me the statistics that show that storms are increasing in quantity or severity on a timescale consistent with anthropogenic warming. OP said that specific storms are climate induced - there is no wa
41.
by alexk307 2y ago
You don't - that's the point.
42.
by alexk307 2y ago
C02 has not doubled yet. We started at 280ppm, we're on to 425ppm.
43.
by alexk307 2y ago
Why start at 1970 when Houston has a temperature record back to 1889? Start in the 60s and the jump is far lower. Or any other year and the difference changes.
44.
by alexk307 2y ago
Houston is a low-lying coastal city surrounded by rivers and bayous whose population has increased 10x since 1950. Not really an ideal situation to build out that kind of housing for millions of people in floodplains.
45.
by alexk307 2y ago
Did you read OP's post?
46.
by alexk307 2y ago
What are climate-change induced typhoons? How are those quantified?
47.
by alexk307 2y ago
They are...just in China, and with 40% tariffs if you want one.
48.
by alexk307 2y ago
> seemingly endless string of heat waves, droughts, floods, wildfires and storms The headline states that we just went through a year of extreme events, but this is all that the NOAA mentions in the article to back that up? Seemingly end
49.
by alexk307 2y ago
Where did H5N2 come from? Isn't all the current alarm/spread coming from H5N1?
50.
by alexk307 2y ago
I'd flip that to you as well - there's literally nothing that doomers can hear that will change their mind that maybe we're not heading for a catastrophe. Of course, it's a real problem, but there are real solutions that
51.
by alexk307 2y ago
Ice maximum shows no trend in 50 years, Antarctica is doing OK all things considered... https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/...
52.
by alexk307 2y ago
Just dive into it and learn slowly. You can write the software in Python if you want, and use whatever regular IDE you normally use.
53.
by alexk307 3y ago
Fascinating, thanks for explaining that
54.
by alexk307 3y ago
Plenty calm. The context of the past 100 years of Jews being slaughtered by the millions kind of does have to do with this conflict. 100% denounce Hamas for slaughtering Jewish people in their own homes. 100% denounce the Israeli government
55.
by alexk307 3y ago
Saying that you know you can and should denounce a terrorist group for slaying 1300+ Jews, and then not doing that, is a bit tone-deaf for the Jewish folks that are still in mourning from watching the worst attack on Jews since the Holocaus
56.
by alexk307 3y ago
> This will most likely be flagged immediately for not denouncing Hamas. Wait, so why don't you denounce them in your post then?
57.
by alexk307 3y ago
The position of being a ketamine addicted narcissist who thinks they know better than everyone? Or the position of being born filthy rich and purchasing stakes of large existing companies that you didn’t build yourself. You can root for Spa
58.
by alexk307 3y ago
Lol imagine being one of the richest people to ever live and spending it like this…
59.
by alexk307 3y ago
I’d wager that most of that data is anonymized and redacted usage and error stats. Big difference between that and entire data sets
60.
by alexk307 3y ago
Not OP but I would never want to use this if I was running a security minded business. Why would it be okay to send out my entire dataset to the Microsoft cloud to run a few simple queries. How long is the data stored on your servers? Since

More ›