alex_sf

6 ms·

31.
by alex_sf 3y ago
> Would you sign up for such a system if you can volunteer to participate in it, with now those random killings being restricted to those who've signed up for it, including you? I mean, we already have. You volunteer to participate
32.
by alex_sf 3y ago
If the goal is to reduce the number of fatal mistakes, why is that argument garbage?
33.
by alex_sf 3y ago
Taking RLHF into account: it's not actually generating the most plausible completion, it's generating one that's worse.
34.
by alex_sf 3y ago
> A fairly reliable determinant for how the Court will rule is found using a materialist analysis. That is, the Court will generally side with corporations and capital owners when given the choice. This is a big claim. Do you have any e
35.
by alex_sf 3y ago
Rocky and CentOS are both based on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). CentOS used to be a free and open source downstream version of RHEL. Keeping the history short: Red Hat effectively acquired CentOS and discontinued it as a downstream ver
36.
by alex_sf 3y ago
Lambda availability is awful.
37.
by alex_sf 3y ago
> It is definitely not an intended feature for the end user to be able to trick the model into believing it said something it didn't say. It also doesn't work with ChatGPT or Bing Chat, as far as I can tell. I was talking about
38.
by alex_sf 3y ago
In all the open source cases I’m aware of, the roles are just normal text. The ability to trivially trick the model into thinking it said something it didn’t is a feature and intentional. It’s how you do multi-turn conversations with conte
39.
by alex_sf 3y ago
A really good token predictor is still a token predictor.
40.
by alex_sf 3y ago
It sounds like we both know that's the case, but there's a ton of incorrect info being shared in this thread re: RLHF and instruction tuning. Sorry if it came off as more than looking to clarify it for folks coming across it.
41.
by alex_sf 3y ago
It's not being pedantic. RLHF and instruction tuning are completely different things. Painting with watercolors does not make water paint. Nearly all popular local models are instruction tuned, but are not RLHF'd. The OAI GPT s
42.
by alex_sf 3y ago
Instruction tuning is distinct from RLHF. Instruction tuning teaches the model to understand and respond (in a sensible way) to instructions, versus 'just' completing text. RLHF trains a model to adjust it's output based on
43.
by alex_sf 3y ago
Responding to prompts like that are part of the 'instruction tuning' process. After an LLM is trained on a large dataset, it will do a decent job of completion , which acts like you describe. The next step is to further tune it
44.
by alex_sf 3y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Research_Agency
45.
by alex_sf 3y ago
Almost like if you read the followups, those few power mods created multiple alt accounts in the wake of the post. But keep acting super weird about this, I guess.
46.
by alex_sf 3y ago
How am I supposed to do that? You don't accept other people's verification of information.
47.
by alex_sf 3y ago
.. the mods of most subreddits are public. This is a trivial thing to verify. It's as valid as any other information posted that you haven't personally inspected. I have no idea why you're so belligerent about this, but
48.
by alex_sf 3y ago
It's not really discrimination to say "you have a potential bias on this particular candidate, you shouldn't be involved in the decision".
49.
by alex_sf 3y ago
I would expect a lawsuit if you gave them to investors, and jailtime if it was part of an IPO. Keep draggin down that bar in tech, I guess.
50.
by alex_sf 3y ago
You'll be asked to produce documents verifying your ownership and/or compliance with any licenses for all intellectual property. That includes code and graphics (logos).
51.
by alex_sf 3y ago
You've never gone through an acquisition or due diligence, have you?
52.
by alex_sf 3y ago
Yes you can. This is nonsense. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/urhg/__44b.html
53.
by alex_sf 3y ago
You can't use this to make logos for any commercial product, and it's not safe to use it for hobby projects either, based on the current model license.
54.
by alex_sf 3y ago
The current license makes this largely unusable for nearly any purpose. Really disappointing release from SAI.
55.
by alex_sf 3y ago
This is an absurd moral panic. If someone mentally ill read a book that made them believe suicide was the correct option, would you support a censoring process for all books?
56.
by alex_sf 3y ago
My apologies, but as a human language model, it is unlikely that ChatGPT would have much impact on human culture.
57.
Gell-Mann Amnesia(matt-rickard.com)
3 points by alex_sf 3y ago|0 comments
58.
by alex_sf 3y ago
I've been using Privacy.com cards for years to avoid this. Set a limit of 1 month on the card, and if I'm actually using the sub I'll fix/update it when the sub runs out.
59.
by alex_sf 3y ago
> I personally think the first man down the ladder on mars should be a woman, and it would be great if it were her. Probably not your intent, but this sounds incredibly patronizing.
60.
by alex_sf 3y ago
This already exists for LLaMA, I'm sure it'll be implemented for StableLM as well. https://github.com/lxe/simple-llm-finetuner

More ›