4 ms·
You can't use this to make logos for any commercial product, and it's not safe to use it for hobby projects either, based on the current model license.
by alex_sf 3y ago
You can't use this to make logos for any commercial product, and it's not safe to use it for hobby projects either, based on the current model license.
- krisoft 3y ago> You can't use this to make logos for any commercial product Yeah good luck figuring out that a particular logo was generated with this particular model. And if someone does good luck doing anything about it. With this amount of fear one wouldn't dare to cross a road without three layers of bubble wrap, plus written authorisation from a lawyer plus a feasibility study from a traffic engineer.
- alex_sf 3y agoYou've never gone through an acquisition or due diligence, have you?
- krisoft 3y agoClearly. Explain it to me what will happen with the generated logo at an acquisition or due diligence.
- alex_sf 3y agoYou'll be asked to produce documents verifying your ownership and/or compliance with any licenses for all intellectual property. That includes code and graphics (logos).
- krisoft 3y agoSure. And what documents and paperwork do you expect if I the owner of the company drawn the logo myself with a bit of a crayon/inkscape/gimp/blender? Those exact documents will be produced.
- alex_sf 3y agoI would expect a lawsuit if you gave them to investors, and jailtime if it was part of an IPO. Keep draggin down that bar in tech, I guess.
- dormento 3y agoYou also cannot just ingest people's media to train a for-profit AI image generation service, and well, here we are. PS: not an AI apologist, just pointing the irony. Feels like those fan sonic characters "original content do not steal".
- alex_sf 3y agoYes you can. This is nonsense. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/urhg/__44b.html https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/urhg/__44b.html