alex43578

5 ms·

61.
by alex43578 1mo ago
I’m disputing that it’s anyone’s responsibility except their own to find a solution to it. Work harder, earn more, or make do with less - they chose to take on two 18 year financial commitments and now are complaining that despite the bevy
62.
by alex43578 1mo ago
People drive into deep water all the time - some states specifically have laws making them financially liable for the cost of rescue because it’s such a stupid thing to do. But still, they do it.
63.
by alex43578 1mo ago
It’s wild because of how shockingly easy basic food photography is. Make a plate, set it in front of a window, snap a picture. I think AI is amazing, but equally amazing is people’s laziness and lack of taste when it comes to applying it.
64.
by alex43578 1mo ago
How well is Europe’s unity through culture playing out when you’re trying to bridge Norway and Somalia, rather than Portugal and Spain or Denmark and the Netherlands? Hell, looking back a decade or two, the PIIGs would’ve been a bit at odds
65.
by alex43578 1mo ago
Presumably the family of 4 isn't a family of 4 from the 1950s. Supporting a family of 4 on $50K or less hasn't been a thing for at a decade, so they were clearly in control of the variables at the relevant point in time. "Sho
66.
by alex43578 1mo ago
If you're implying abortion (or Swift's proposal) is the only option for birth control, you're very wrong. Are there any roadblocks to condoms or contraceptives in any state in America? I'm not aware of one.
67.
by alex43578 1mo ago
Vaccination has a very reasonable public health argument, even ignoring the fact that it has been massively eroded, and comparing vaccination to social media is disingenuous. If Timmy is on Instagram, John’s health isn’t at risk. If Timmy c
68.
by alex43578 1mo ago
Sure sounds like they can’t afford a family of 4 on that income. They have control over both variables in that situation.
69.
by alex43578 1mo ago
Why are you allowed to dictate how others raise their children? They don’t get a say in your kids diet or religion or choice of sport.
70.
by alex43578 2mo ago
Has anyone made an EU regulation article Madlibs yet? I need a [industry where the EU is lagging], [justification for raising a tax], [food with a PDO label], and a [refugee group who gets special treatment].
71.
by alex43578 2mo ago
What’s a “rigged” chip in this context?
72.
by alex43578 2mo ago
Very different processes. Even setting up a new CPU design in a fab that already makes CPU dies is months of validation, for context.
73.
by alex43578 2mo ago
That's an erosion of privacy where you have (had?) an expectation of privacy. In the US, you could always be recorded in public, excluding narrow exceptions for things like voyeurism or harassment.
74.
by alex43578 2mo ago
If we’re playing what-if, consider the contributions those spy satellites made to keep the Cold War cold and provide for decades of Pax Americana and a security umbrella over Europe that they didn’t have to pay for.
75.
by alex43578 2mo ago
So to my original point, the Flock camera does not violate any rights. Even the system aggregating the data, like Google or your cell provider, doesn’t violate any rights. It’s only the government searching that database without a warrant t
76.
by alex43578 2mo ago
Yes, and all this ties nicely to Flock: Google/Flock can collect the data - constitutional. Google/Flock can sell the data - constitutional. There’s the potential for searching the database to require a warrant, but the cameras
77.
by alex43578 2mo ago
“Why can't we expect some level of privacy in a public place?” Because it’s a public place. We already have laws covering things like harassment, voyeurism, etc; so existing legal conduct in a public place should remain legal.
78.
by alex43578 2mo ago
Can you name the specific right? For the first, assumably you think you can’t be observed coming or going from a riot? That’s not true. For the fourth, a Flock camera existing is not inherently a search, just like how a database of cell rec
79.
by alex43578 2mo ago
Not for the data brokers, advertisers, and employees of the orgs. Every feigned panic because some cop Flock-searched an ex rings a little hollow when you consider the reach and lack of accountability present across the data collection sche
80.
by alex43578 2mo ago
I never said that there was a plausible connection between public roads and privacy - I still maintain it’s the most clear cut example of a public place without an expectation of privacy imaginable. Unfortunately your eyes weren’t open enou
81.
by alex43578 2mo ago
“Individuals have reasonable expectations of privacy in their cell phone location information. The court did not hold that geofence warrants are unconstitutional ”
82.
by alex43578 2mo ago
Is the same outrage present for your cell-carrier, credit card issuer, email provider, and the dozen other data-collecting orgs you assumably interact with throughout the day? They've built a more comprehensive pattern of life on you t
83.
by alex43578 2mo ago
Good thing the courts are already upholding the constitutionality of Flock in US v Jackson and Schmidt v. City of Norfolk. If it reaches the SC, I think it'd be easy to see a limit similar to Carpenter on scope and duration of the sear
84.
by alex43578 2mo ago
Every security camera on Earth is there "to surveil or monitor innocent people". That's inherently how they work.
85.
by alex43578 2mo ago
Carpenter only covers cell data and was specifically meant to apply narrowly to that type of info.
86.
by alex43578 2mo ago
That's a pretty nebulous answer. Just to help solidify my understanding of your position, can the government ever operate a camera recording a public roadway?
87.
by alex43578 2mo ago
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures" in case you forgot. I'm not saying you have to reply in a technical term - just explain how bein
88.
by alex43578 2mo ago
"Right to privacy" isn't a specific right in the US. Furthermore, being in the middle of a public roadway in a registered vehicle shouldn't confer the expectation of privacy, per Katz. Probably the closest case law is Ca
89.
by alex43578 2mo ago
I've yet to hear a convincing connection between driving down a public road and having privacy - in fact, the outside of a registered motor vehicle on a public road is about as non-private as you can expect. You already have a unique p
90.
by alex43578 2mo ago
Do you think George parking his horse/car in a public parking lot outside a brothel should confer an expectation of privacy? Can a bank or ATM miles away have a security camera, just on the off-chance that George stops to withdraw cash

More ›