alaricus

23 ms·

211.
by alaricus 4y ago
Nothing beats "it's cheaper". What happened to blue collar jobs in the US is coming for white collar jobs. Even if you don't do it, your competitor will and drive you out of business.
212.
by alaricus 4y ago
Of course. Why pay US salaries and US rents, when the rest of the world is cheaper and probably has better tech talent?
213.
by alaricus 4y ago
if we had a single sign in system, you would have been banned from the internet already :)
214.
by alaricus 4y ago
Palantir is as evil as a corporation gets.
215.
by alaricus 4y ago
It's easier to keep multiple yubikeys than multiple phones. Also Google relying on Google for anything important/critical is a bad idea. The internet is full of people complaining that Google deactivated their account for no appa
216.
by alaricus 4y ago
I lost my phone on a business trip. It was a nightmare. Don't use your phone as a 2FA for everything. It creates a devastating single point of failure.
217.
by alaricus 4y ago
It's really serious? Wow! Not even Microsoft TPMs write such nonsense. Forcing people to have a single ID across the web is a terrible idea. Having multiple disjoint accounts makes it much more difficult to track your activity onlin
218.
by alaricus 4y ago
Is this serious or a bad attempt at sarcasm?
219.
by alaricus 4y ago
This sounds dystopian and also really bad engineering. First, I don't want a single login for everywhere. For obvious privacy reasons, using multiple disjoint accounts is preferable. Second, using a device to identify someone creates
220.
by alaricus 4y ago
literally anyone else.
221.
by alaricus 4y ago
Peertube and Odysee to the rescue!
222.
by alaricus 4y ago
It is a terrible idea to let Microsoft, Google and Apple to redesign a passwordless future. They don't have a spotless record.
223.
by alaricus 4y ago
Most of my accounts are unimportant and nothing would happen if they stolen or hijacked. I totally write down those passwords somewhere. The important ones are not in writing anywhere (like bank logins). There is no reason to pretent all
224.
by alaricus 4y ago
Tying logins to biometrics is a terrible idea. Forcing all online logins to comply with the wishes of 3 tech giants is even a worse one. This has nothing to do with privacy. It's about existing monopolies entrenching their monopolies
225.
by alaricus 4y ago
Your solution to insecure passwords is to hand the keys of the internet to a small number of companies? This is beyond ridiculous. Not only this creates single points of failure, it also entrenches the already existing monopolies out there