alansaber

6 ms·

1. 151.▲
   by alansaber 2mo ago

   For good reason, lol
2. 152.▲
   by alansaber 2mo ago

   Hey. We still have TV shows that air once a week (and people loudly complain that it takes too long)
3. 153.▲
   by alansaber 2mo ago

   Turning a static site off is excellent ragebait
4. 154.▲
   Ask HN: Rename ChatGPT?

   2 points by alansaber 2mo ago|1 comments
5. 155.▲
   by alansaber 2mo ago

   You joke but...
6. 156.▲
   by alansaber 2mo ago

   Hey listen man cheap tokens are cheap tokens
7. 157.▲
   by alansaber 2mo ago

   The finetunes will continue until morale increases.
8. 158.▲
   by alansaber 2mo ago

   For sure, there is a big subset of tasks where ultra low latency >>> other concerns
9. 159.▲
   by alansaber 2mo ago

   What could go wrong with building them as fast as physically possible?
10. 160.▲
    by alansaber 2mo ago

    "why not just gather facts yourself" vs "i use them every day", the duality of man. But yes, I appreciate that LLM output is theoretically completely untrustworthy- but when in practice I observe that it's around 90
11. 161.▲
    by alansaber 2mo ago

    Sounds like a tricky problem that will get a low-tech solution like a blacklist, whitelist, or chatGPT-approved vendor list.
12. 162.▲
    by alansaber 2mo ago

    Nuance is challenging for the general public when it comes to AI adoption.
13. 163.▲
    by alansaber 2mo ago

    Yep. Anything, but in particular less popular subreddits, are absolutely infested. Sometimes 80% of the responses I get are bots.
14. 164.▲
    by alansaber 2mo ago

    This is just not true at all.
15. 165.▲
    by alansaber 2mo ago

    The implementation is usually pretty ugly, actually
16. 166.▲
    by alansaber 2mo ago

    The bar has dropped when the dialogue evolves to "output is less annoying" rather than some interesting new capability
17. 167.▲
    by alansaber 2mo ago

    Isn't every summarization a reduction?
18. 168.▲
    by alansaber 2mo ago

    Finally, ATC for my garden
19. 169.▲
    by alansaber 2mo ago

    In the physical sciences, any sufficiently important paper is independently verified. Sounds like cost/effort of these multi year studies is not faesible to replicate, but then again, I know nothing about social science so w/e
20. 170.▲
    by alansaber 2mo ago

    There is a lot of bad ML research for the same reason.
21. 171.▲
    by alansaber 2mo ago

    Choose between 1. You don't love what you're working on or 2. You don't enjoy working with AI. IMO those are the two primary problems, and both solvable in their own way (more or less).
22. 172.▲
    by alansaber 2mo ago

    Less bureaucracy should be the focus of AI marketing, rather than global superintelligent robots or smut generation
23. 173.▲
    by alansaber 2mo ago

    Maybe for the occasional something. If I had an actual workflow i'd prefer a dedicated tool over the newest chatgpt "do everything" app.
24. 174.▲
    by alansaber 2mo ago

    My spot trading news is invalid unless it uses 1s candles
25. 175.▲
    by alansaber 2mo ago

    Just buy the bottom and sell the top. Are they stupid?
26. 176.▲
    by alansaber 2mo ago

    Kind of crazy how a simple QOL lift (stamping a commit to an agent session, or persisting a session logs on cloud) is considered either innovation or controvertial
27. 177.▲
    by alansaber 2mo ago

    Yes you need a VCS and to recalculate relationships at certain thresholds. It adds a lot of complexity and computarional overhead, which is why there's no uniform widespread graph use
28. 178.▲
    by alansaber 2mo ago

    Mathematically, yes.
29. 179.▲
    by alansaber 2mo ago

    This is great for evidence grounding, but doesn't produce a large memory/reasoning improvement (in most cases)
30. 180.▲
    by alansaber 2mo ago

    Theoretically but practically any LLM generated infra/classification set is going to drift due to inaccuracy and harm IR/whatever logical process you're using. I am a big fan of using a loose taxonomy but it's not been r