ajslater

16 ms·

121.
by ajslater 16y ago
Exactly. OP is doing gymnastics to solve a non-problem.
122.
by ajslater 16y ago
I can't agree with rdl more. You should re-stage your poll.
123.
by ajslater 16y ago
They license their technology to PayPal, and perhaps others. What the rev deal is, I have no idea.
124.
by ajslater 16y ago
...and they broke up and misused the Alpha design team.
125.
by ajslater 16y ago
I knew a senior manager at Intel. The company encourages you use the words 'significant competitive advantage'. Not that ugly 'M' word.
126.
by ajslater 16y ago
http://xkcd.com/182/
127.
by ajslater 16y ago
They email every six months.
128.
by ajslater 16y ago
An article with accompanying paper link that makes a similar point. With a little epidemiology thrown in to boot: http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/research-review/straight-ta...
129.
by ajslater 16y ago
Exceptionally creative people are frequently eccentric. Eccentric people are not frequently exceptionally creative.
130.
by ajslater 16y ago
Saturated fat is not "bad" for you. Not getting enough essential fatty acids (polyunsaturated fats) is bad for you. Not having enough unsaturated fats either through dietary intake or conversion from EFAs is bad for you. Having a high Ome
131.
by ajslater 16y ago
correct. usually with refined carbohydrates. which is a much more probable bugbear of modern health. Along with high omega-6 to omega-3 fat ratios.
132.
by ajslater 16y ago
http://www.mobydickthewhale.com/moby-dick/moby-dick-chapter-... Be it known that, waiving all argument, I take the good old fashioned ground that the whale is a fish, and call upon holy Jonah to back me. This fundamental thing settled, th
133.
by ajslater 16y ago
I know several people in $300K+/yr treadmill jobs. I wouldn't trade places with them for all the world. I like to think that if I found myself with their salary I would have my priorities in a different order, but there's no guarantee of th
134.
by ajslater 16y ago
I too enjoy Bowden's books and wish I could upvote you twice.
135.
by ajslater 16y ago
The princeton study's methodology is as bad as that 'science in action' photo would lead you to believe. The short version: http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/03/hfcs-makes-rats-fat/ The long version at Ars: http://arstechnica.com/science
136.
by ajslater 16y ago
Men's World Raw Powerlifting Records: http://www.powerliftingwatch.com/records/raw/world Women: http://www.powerliftingwatch.com/records/raw/women-world Yours Truly: 198lbs and stronger than any woman at that weight, but weaker than rec
137.
by ajslater 17y ago
The princeton study is very poor science. Here's a good summary of why: http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/03/hfcs-makes-rats-fat/ And here's a longer article about why at Ars: http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2010/03/does-high-fructo..