Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ajkjk
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
30 ms
·
631.
▲
by
ajkjk
1y ago
Fascism is thrown around by the left to describes things as fascist that are fascist and then the people who don't like being called that whine that it's a smear instead of reckoning with the criticism. Cause no one reckons with c
632.
▲
by
ajkjk
1y ago
I don't think so? To me 'harvest' implies that the crop is destroyed afterwards.
633.
▲
by
ajkjk
1y ago
More... money...
634.
▲
by
ajkjk
1y ago
Man it is weird that the word for that is "harvesting".
635.
▲
by
ajkjk
1y ago
It's a much-needed idea but... such an awkward way to do it. Only Java would be okay with an actual language feature using words like "orElseGet". And personally I suspect there's an inverse correlation between feature u
636.
▲
by
ajkjk
1y ago
No way. You can't make a decent single web page by iframing a bunch of components together.
637.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
How so?
638.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
This book [1], which is the creator's diaries from the time annotated with lots of memoir-ish details, is really really good and talks about how the motion capture came to be at length. It's also just a very enjoyable book, not to
639.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
true. it is also pretty bad at IDing things that are half-formed, eg a bud that hasn't bloomed yet, presumably because most photos in the dataset are of the blooming version.
640.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
"reveals" -> "argues"
641.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
I feel like seek's IDs are not as good as they should be given the state of ML. Maybe a dataset problem but still.
642.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
From a cursory reading I think they're referring to the idea that an electron traveling at v < c is a superposition of an electron traveling at c and a positron traveling at c. Which also is where the zitterbewegung comes from, beca
643.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
well all of physics uses differential geometry
644.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
The fact that it's some generalization of Maxwell makes it more fun, though---should means it's testable.
645.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
This is upstream of that: geometric in the sense that it doesn't involve gluing an additional a U(1) field to spacetime at every point (from which coulomb's law etc. emerge).
646.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
Stack tracing, however, can be very costly. At least if you trace every thread. (well, when I did it it was in python on python threads, which I have to assume is a lot worse. Not sure about native threads.)
647.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
I would guess it's something corporate. They can afford to pause the UI and ship debugging traces home more than a real-time game might.
648.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
I kinda disagree? mostly I see people use roguelite to refer to roguelikes with progression and roguelike for those without. But I suppose both are also called roguelike as a gloss.
649.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
You are being intentionally obtuse. It's not the word on its own, it's the word in context: in a news article in a sentence like that one. It's not a 100% given, but it's fairly strong evidence given a basic understandin
650.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
Large scale divergence in the two human moralities: social morality (rules for people around us to protect the community, largely coded liberal) and personal morality (moral intuitions for how to keep you and your immediate family safe). Th
651.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
well it's that phrase, not just the word, although the word is a tell. And it's not absurd. It is absurd to think it's absurd. You are being ignorant.
652.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
Your inability to tell when things are AI doesn't mean other people can't. Same phenomenon happens all the time with food or wine. One person thinks everyone is making up the subtle flavor profile comments and sneers at them. Ever
653.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
I feel like forgetting to multiply by sqrt(-g) must have been a pretty easy mistake to make back then. This stuff was new!
654.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
?? that quote makes me think it's accurate, not inaccurate
655.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
if you say something's provably false but you don't prove or even allude to a reason why someone should believe you, um, it's not very convincing
656.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
More abstractly: maybe you want to pick your preferred app to do it with instead of being artificially prevented by the phone's maker.
657.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
Nah, I dislike the thing I was talking about. You are choosing to misunderstand me, but I have no idea why.
658.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
Sure? I don't have to like it.
659.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
You misunderstand. I'm not being cynical: it really actually does work this way. I'm describing a thing that I have seen happen from the inside. Paul Graham wrote about it here: https://www.paulgraham.com/submarine
660.
▲
by
ajkjk
2y ago
Betting it's not him but his publisher. There is a massive industry dedicated to this sort of guerrilla marketing these days. If a company of a certain size is putting out a press release they will coordinate to have seemingly-unrelate
More ›