3 ms·
if you say something's provably false but you don't prove or even allude to a reason why someone should believe you, um, it's not very convincing
by ajkjk 2y ago
if you say something's provably false but you don't prove or even allude to a reason why someone should believe you, um, it's not very convincing
- moralestapia 2y agoYou're 100% right on that. But this should be enough for you, "This account is based on interviews with dozens of people who lived through one of the wildest business stories of all time"
- crazygringo 2y agoThat sounds like... they did extensive research and standard journalistic double-checking so it's probably correct? The WSJ isn't some random blog. Regardless of what you think of their opinion pages, their reporting is generally factually legit. So you seem to be suggesting that their story is, indeed, correct.
- moralestapia 2y agoGood, then I also did "extensive research and standard journalistic double-checking" or whatever.
- crazygringo 2y agoFantastic! You interviewed dozens of people directly involved? And corroborated everything independently at least once? Then please share your own version of events, we'd all love to read it! If you spent weeks doing all that research, I'm sure it was so others could learn?
- ajkjk 2y ago?? that quote makes me think it's accurate, not inaccurate