Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ajam1507
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
ajam1507
5mo ago
That was Meta. The judge ruled in the Anthropic case that they infringed because they downloaded pirated copies of books that they could have otherwise purchased legally, and for retaining copies of those books as a central library.
32.
▲
by
ajam1507
5mo ago
In Bartz v. Anthropic the judge ruled that Anthropic making a digital copy of a printed book and then discarding the physical book was not infringing when used to a train a model.
33.
▲
by
ajam1507
5mo ago
This is contradicted by the amount of AI use at top tech firms.
34.
▲
by
ajam1507
5mo ago
An acronym is an abbreviation, and they specifically do not spell out the very first acronym on the page the first time they use it.
35.
▲
by
ajam1507
5mo ago
This page has 5 abbreviations that are not spelled out before you even get to the body of the article.
36.
▲
by
ajam1507
5mo ago
This seems more like a failure of management and process than a problem inherent to autonomy.
37.
▲
by
ajam1507
5mo ago
It very much depends on what kind of company you work for. You could never run a startup like this, for example.
38.
▲
by
ajam1507
5mo ago
You can't just burn money in a pit to get the best AI model out. Undoubtedly some of the smartest people in the world are working on frontier AI.
39.
▲
by
ajam1507
5mo ago
And you think with all of this money they are employing idiots?
40.
▲
by
ajam1507
5mo ago
Pretty wild to say that the company with one of the best models (arguably the best) is a bunch of idiots.
41.
▲
by
ajam1507
5mo ago
> I'm assuming they wouldn't do something like this unless the recent load issues (mostly driven by OpenClaw usage) were seen as an existential threat. I think another possibility is that they are trying to shift the burden of
42.
▲
by
ajam1507
6mo ago
Seems silly to bash a company for using open source exactly in accordance with the license. If they expected to be compensated, they picked the wrong licensing terms.
43.
▲
by
ajam1507
6mo ago
And what do you think they could do with those things?
44.
▲
by
ajam1507
6mo ago
It shouldn't be the role of a company to hold their nose and work with the government, it should be the government's role to inspire confidence that what they are doing with the technology is ethical. > Calling people who work
45.
▲
by
ajam1507
6mo ago
I think you've missed the point of a thought experiment entirely.
46.
▲
by
ajam1507
6mo ago
> Depending on where you live, a reasonable portion to the large majority of the population is now dead. The ones alive have, by definition, a strong bias towards individualism and noncooperation. Anyone who picked blue gambled their own
47.
▲
by
ajam1507
6mo ago
> Blue is purely a win-win for me Dying is a win for you?
48.
▲
by
ajam1507
6mo ago
The checks and balance are between the 3 branches of government. If congress wanted to stop the war, they could. If the supreme court wanted to hand the power to start wars back to congress they could. Just because they don't, doesn&#x
49.
▲
by
ajam1507
6mo ago
It still shows a problem. If math and reading levels were largely improving for decades then we saw a sudden decline, it signals that something changed, especially since covid.
50.
▲
by
ajam1507
6mo ago
The image is likely older than the article given this picture from over a year ago. https://www.instagram.com/p/DGQ01bzTwyo/
51.
▲
by
ajam1507
6mo ago
> do they have anything similar to SynthID, or are they just pretending that problem doesn't exist? At least they aren't pretending that a solution exists.
52.
▲
by
ajam1507
6mo ago
There are also plenty of people who think you can't prove whether the Christian God exists. I don't take those people seriously. Don't mistake continued debate amongst "experts" as being a signal that something is u
53.
▲
by
ajam1507
6mo ago
> We don't even know what human consciousness is. I think Douglas Hofstadter satisfactorily answered this question. > We can't even answer if we have free will or not. Sure we can, it's just that most people don't
54.
▲
by
ajam1507
6mo ago
> But I look around and I just don't see anyone implementing such policies. Because we have low unemployment. As long as we have jobs for people, you shouldn't expect UBI.
55.
▲
by
ajam1507
6mo ago
Why do you need a job in the scenario where machines have replaced all human labor? You're forgetting that work is a means, not an end, for humanity.
56.
▲
by
ajam1507
6mo ago
Using a 3 prong extension cable on the charger will prevent this.
57.
▲
by
ajam1507
6mo ago
No need to look at history. We have plenty of contemporary examples.
58.
▲
by
ajam1507
6mo ago
They should be spending exactly $0 on marketing. They're sending people around the moon in a giant rocket ship. It sells itself.
59.
▲
by
ajam1507
6mo ago
Yes, it's dangerous and the benefits of sending people to the Moon and Mars are few.
60.
▲
by
ajam1507
6mo ago
That was before they knew AI needed a bunch of money.
More ›