ajam1507

6 ms·

61.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
Did you mean to post this comment in 2021?
62.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
Maybe it's unavailable in your region. Four options on this page for me. https://antigravity.google/pricing
63.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
Even if an AI company spends more on inference than their revenue, that does not mean that they are selling inference at a loss.
64.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
Even if this were true, this does not justify any particular type of action, except maybe an in kind response. For example, would they have been justified to murder the blogger?
65.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
Journalism is absolutely not by definiton a secondary source. If a journalist is on location covering a flood, for example, they are the primary source. A journalist conducting an interview would also be a primary source.
66.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
The primary source for most news is journalism.
67.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
So their desire to not be used to commit a cyberattack doesn’t factor in? As long as they aren’t legally liable, it doesn’t matter? Also a checkbox that says something like “I would like to help commit a crime using my internet traffic” wou
68.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
That works better when there is a defendant.
69.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
The doctor using the word “whiplash” is one of the authors of the study.
70.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
So you shouldn’t have to inform your users that their traffic will be used in a cyberattack?
71.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
> Not defending any party, it's basic ethological expectation: a creature that try to beat an other should expect aggressive response in return. Another basic ethological expectation is that the strong dominate the weak, but maybe w
72.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
And what’s the context for using the internet traffic of your unsuspecting users to accomplish this?
73.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
> You don't think non-consensually revealing somebody's identity is a problem? I do think it’s a problem. You are the only one excusing bad behavior here.
74.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
You don’t think leveraging your site to DDOS someone is a problem? Do people not also deserve to be protected from being DDOSed? Do people also not deserve to not have their internet traffic be used to DDOS someone?
75.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
This is far too general of a philosophy to be applied in the dark. You can't say, without any familiarity with what the actual software looks like whether a rewrite is the best way to proceed. There are plenty of projects that get bogg
76.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
This post's title is hyperbolic at best. At best the author is noticing what most people have known for a long time, there are bots on the internet. Most interactions I have online are with real people. Maybe we will end up with a dead
77.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
Gemini is not a reliable source. You posted the only part of the AI response that isn't useful in verifying whether it is true.
78.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
Sorry, I don't find it very interesting to debate whether the sky is blue. We can agree to disagree.
79.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
> There's lots of "politically incorrect" things which is a symptom of low filtration. Politically incorrect things might be a symptom of low filtration on almost any other site, but not one run by Elon Musk. He has a clea
80.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
Who needs censorship when you have an algorithm to feed people what you want them to see and you've self-selected for only people who aren't morally opposed to the new site? Don't be fooled into thinking you're getting a
81.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
And in every case there are people like you making excuses for them. Engineers working at OpenAI are not scraping by to provide for their families. They don't get a pass to do unethical things to keep their jobs.
82.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
> I think the real threat is that if you tip the Iranian conflict over into asymmetrical warfare We're there already. We've been there. There's nothing symmetrical about this war. Israel is basically unscathed in this war
83.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
Except the "person" reading the book is a corporation worth billions and you didn't get any money from them.
84.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
What would you have them do instead?
85.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
Just a few dozen more scenarios like this and we might have to start thinking something is wrong.
86.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
Again, this is all assuming that we have formulated the problem correctly. So much of the value of experiments in solving hard problems is not so much the results, but in how those results steer the formulation of a theory. It's hard t
87.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
How is an author fairly compensated when you torrent their book? Should we just stop paying for media because it's infinitely reproducible? Nothing physical is being stolen when a company makes a clone of a product based on another com
88.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
"I didn't kill him, officer. It was the bullet."
89.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
This assumes that what's holding back solving hard problems is designing experiments to get novel data. Einstein's though experiments were very productive despite not taking place in a lab.
90.
by ajam1507 7mo ago
> The "hallucination" behavior alone should be enough to reject any claims that these are at least minimally similar to animal intelligence. Can you elaborate on why you think this is the case?

More ›