aiforecastthway

8 ms·

31.
by aiforecastthway 2y ago
I wish I could get access to the "App'x 29" being referenced so that I could better understand the judges' understanding here. I assume this is Federal Appendix 29 (in which case a more thorough reference would've b
32.
by aiforecastthway 2y ago
> Is there any such thing as this surveillence applying to the inside of the renters bed room, bath room, filing cabinet with medical or financial documents, or political for that matter? Yes. Entering property for regular maintenance.
33.
by aiforecastthway 2y ago
I agree. This is a case where the physical analogy leads us to (imo) the correct conclusion: compelling major property management companies to perform regular searches of their tenant's properties, and then to report any findings to
34.
by aiforecastthway 2y ago
I don't think the analogy holds for two reasons (which cut in opposite directions from the perspective of fourth amendment jurisprudence, fwiw). First, the dragnet surveillance that Google performs is very different from the targeted s
35.
by aiforecastthway 2y ago
The main factual components are as follows: Party A has rented out property to Party B. Party A performs surveillance on or around the property with Party B's knowledge and consent. Party A discovers very high probability evidence that
36.
by aiforecastthway 2y ago
> No, that's just investing. Yes. Investing is passive income. If you have $20M and your lifestyle requires no more than $800K/yr of income taxed a waaaaay lower rates than the working stiffs pay on the same, then a 4% return
37.
by aiforecastthway 2y ago
The original "AI Winter" was primarily a government funding phenomenon [1]. There was no "bubble" in the private sector. I.e., the winter was the result of responsible people in government realizing the hype was over-e
38.
by aiforecastthway 2y ago
> very well said... Thank you; that's very kind. > your point is far more central to the discussion i feel the people compiling the figures wanted to spark. I tend to agree. > And while its a worthy argument i hafta say &
39.
by aiforecastthway 2y ago
The establishments are owned by a corporate person named "Uno Restaurant Holdings Corporation". So calling it Uno's isn't inconsistent with how we talk about Walmart's stores or Google's website, for example.
40.
by aiforecastthway 2y ago
> This is not a serious argument. You're telling me that if shareholders see a founder divest entirely from their companies, they aren't going to take that as a bad signal, and also choose to divest? Bullshit. Other investors
41.
by aiforecastthway 2y ago
I think you have the correct set of facts but entirely the wrong conclusion. Would the richest people WANT to liquidate holdings for the value that Forbes estimates their worth at? I doubt it. The marginal value of millions of dollars to th
42.
by aiforecastthway 2y ago
> Models are biased, but it is a bias we control through the selection of training data. But what if controlling bias is impossible because the very format of the data demands its emergence? I always thought both structuralism and post
43.
by aiforecastthway 2y ago
> Keep in mind this is rank speculation 20 years into the future. It's a bit amusing that the comment right next to yours (albiet a cousin not a sibling) is insisting that what I'm describing is already happening. The (naive)
44.
by aiforecastthway 2y ago
> Exciting. Fast forward 20 years and we have propaganda machines that have been optimized on a nearly individual level, available to the highest bidder (or, more likely, available only to the people who happen to control the attention
45.
by aiforecastthway 2y ago
This paper is important to read. The tone of the introduction is a bit preachy and the findings as stated are underwhelming and beyond obvious [1]. But when reading this type of papers -- and academic literature in general -- don't c
46.
by aiforecastthway 2y ago
Symbolic regression has the same failure mode; the reasons why the model failed can be explained in a more digestible way, but the actual truth of what happened is fundamentally similar -- some coefficient was off by some amount and/or
47.
by aiforecastthway 2y ago
> If it wasn’t then, theoretically the US healthcare industry would grind to a halt considering the number of intermediaries for a single transaction. It just occurred to me that cleaning up our country's data privacy / data
48.
by aiforecastthway 2y ago
The thing that I like about the Hobbit 77 film is that it realizes the material is a child's fantasy book. It's a breath of fresh air in a our current era -- where VCs seem to understand that any attempt to profit off of the Ameri
49.
by aiforecastthway 2y ago
I recently had a conversation with a 33 year old who I would consider both intelligent and well-educated, including some college. His uncle is a lawyer (I met him at some family+friends party or another) who he spent a lo of time around. I
50.
by aiforecastthway 3y ago
The study [1] doesn't say who the experts were, but a related paper [2] by the same authors states that the sample drew heavily from the Effective Altruism community. I would be pretty skeptical of generalizing these results to a sampl