ahuth

21 ms·

241.
by ahuth 12y ago
Well written article. With Rails, though, you don't need to worry about any of this. Just define your modules and add controllers/services/directives/whatever to them as needed using as many files as you want, and it jus
242.
by ahuth 12y ago
I also made a gem for rails called Emcee that does inlining and concatenation: http://github.com/ahuth/emcee . It also let's you use CoffeeScript or SASS (or anything else that Sprockets recognizes).
243.
by ahuth 12y ago
For anyone using Rails, I've made a gem which integrates Web components seamlessly into the asset pipeline. This gives you two things: 1. In production, all imports get concatenation into 1 HTML import. 2. Any web component can use ass
244.
by ahuth 12y ago
Why would the leak cause major portions of the engine to need to be rewritten? Seems more likely that it was a convenient excuse.
245.
by ahuth 12y ago
This I can start to understand/buy. Good point
246.
by ahuth 12y ago
I reject that I said they had it coming. My point is that re-securing their network does not seems like a financial damage to me. If they had known about their vulnerability beforehand, I'm sure they would've spent the time and mo
247.
by ahuth 12y ago
Good point. I'm sure those were stressful times to be at Valve
248.
by ahuth 12y ago
Obviously they should've spent the time to secure their network before hand! Also, can't say I buy the hypothetical piracy cost. Does anyone have any examples of other engines copying Source features from the source code?
249.
by ahuth 12y ago
Can't say I'm convinced. They probably wish they'd spent that money securing their network before this happened... Also, who else had access to their network? This kid getting caught may have saved Valve from other breaches..
250.
by ahuth 12y ago
I'm not condoning breaking into the network and stealing source code, but what financial damage did this cause to Valve? The article repeatedly refers to financial damages, but I'm not sure how that is.
251.
by ahuth 12y ago
I try not to let stuff like this get me upset, because you can never fix people. Now I just need to keep working on having a positive outlook while realizing that there are a ton of terrible people out there. Of course, Chahal (and most ter
252.
by ahuth 12y ago
Not only does it look great, but the logic is sound as well - the homepage is to get new users interested in it, and to get them up and running with it as easily as possible. It really shows that the author did his or her homework. The anal
253.
by ahuth 12y ago
I disagree. Haskell is unfamiliar, AND it's difficult. They're separate. In any case, I'm definitely not smart enough to use it. The issue isn't functional programming, though, which is why Elixir looks very interesting.
254.
by ahuth 12y ago
United States, Will relocate anywhere in the US or will work remotely Stack: Javascript (AngularJS), Ruby, Rails Résumé: http://andrew.huth.me , http://github.com/ahuth Contact: andrew@huth.me Looking for a compa
255.
by ahuth 12y ago
The point is valid and one I hadn't thought of: would employees be truthful knowing that what they say will be reported to the company? I like to think that I would, but none of us know how we would react until put in that situation.
256.
by ahuth 12y ago
The Go playground and tour won't generate random numbers: "Note: the environment in which these programs are executed is deterministic, so rand.Intn will always return the same number." Could this cause iteration order to be
257.
by ahuth 12y ago
Here: http://blog.golang.org/go-maps-in-action "When iterating over a map with a range loop, the iteration order is not specified and is not guaranteed to be the same from one iteration to the next." Also, "S
258.
by ahuth 12y ago
I'm seeing a lot of "No you're wrong!" responses to this comment. I think they're missing the point. Most of the projects I come across for Go are for things that traditionally have been in Ruby/Python's c
259.
by ahuth 12y ago
Thanks. I'm definitely not an expert at Go.
260.
by ahuth 12y ago
You're probably right. Also, I obviously should've said, "Except the first one is much more readable to me ." I definitely don't have a problem with the Go developers keeping out random syntax additions unless they
261.
by ahuth 12y ago
There isn't much difference between this: "My name is #{name} and surname is #{surname}" and this: "My name is " + name + " and surname is " + surname or this: fmt.Println("My
262.
by ahuth 13y ago
Also, your phone is potentially tracking your location right now. Maybe not yours, personally, but in general.
263.
by ahuth 13y ago
Nice catch. That is some of the worst logic I've ever seen.
264.
by ahuth 13y ago
12 minutes and 45 seconds. Trying to remember how you find a regex match in Javascript slowed me up.
265.
by ahuth 13y ago
That was just a snarky remark, and I have nothing to back it up. I should have instead stated my opinion that people's priorities and incentives change as more money/pressure get involved.
266.
by ahuth 13y ago
AngularJS may be complicated to learn, but I found it so much easier than the alternatives (Ember and Backbone). To be fair, though, Backbone isn't trying to do as much as Angular. And Ember is just crazy. I Know people swear by it,
267.
by ahuth 13y ago
Defining marriage as being between a man and woman isn't like giving food stamps to poor people. The bottom line for me is that America is supposed to be a place of freedom and equality. If we're going to say that a man and woman
268.
by ahuth 13y ago
Billions of dollars happened.
269.
by ahuth 13y ago
Holding an unpopular opinion that is all about increasing fairness and equality (racial equality, feminism, gay rights, etc.) is completely different than holding one that is about decreasing fairness and equality. We cannot compare Eic
270.
by ahuth 13y ago
Microsoft should do whatever makes the most sense for them and their customers...which probably is not to continue to support XP.

More ›