Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ahepp
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
1.
▲
by
ahepp
10d ago
actual or perceived realtime / determinism requirements
2.
▲
by
ahepp
10d ago
TCP/IP refers to the whole protocol stack, including UDP. That is a bit counterintuitive, but well established: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_protocol_suite
3.
▲
by
ahepp
13d ago
> I don't see a reason to trust it any less than closed-hardware, closed-source solutions. I would trust a fully-open-source PIKVM more, however. Isn't jetKVM software open source? I thought it had a public buildroot fork? Been
4.
▲
by
ahepp
14d ago
> The accidental static bleeding from onboard hardware, coupling through satellite structures and radiating across frequencies nobody authorized. > The numbers tell the story bluntly: I wouldn't waste too much compute trying to p
5.
▲
by
ahepp
17d ago
Doesn't the premise that there's something inferior about these AI solutions, imply that there is something superior about human intelligence and that there will continue to be some kind of useful work for humans to do?
6.
▲
by
ahepp
19d ago
Not the main point at all, but what was it? Pattern matching rule nestled deep in /lib/systemd/network? Some kind of mysterious netplan / NetworkManager compat layer?
7.
▲
by
ahepp
19d ago
You need the next token to begin the next decode. So if you can get what might be the next token in half the time, you can kick off the next decode before the true decode for this token has finished. If the draft was wrong you can kill th
8.
▲
by
ahepp
20d ago
I was so optimistic about using LLMs for "write once, read many" English language documents, but the more I've used the tools, the more pessimistic I get. More and more, I try to ask it for low prose responses because its wri
9.
▲
by
ahepp
20d ago
>I wondered if you have tried running all of your own writings through it to verify that it thinks you are human. I was struck by Freddie deBoer's recent piece where he did this Maybe I'm taking the "all" too literall
10.
▲
by
ahepp
20d ago
What kind of prompting are you using to get those results? Anything I have claude or codex write carries a ton of distinctive characteristics. Obsession with "bit-for-bit identical", "it's not the X it's the Y Z&quo
11.
▲
by
ahepp
20d ago
A bigger question I'm interested in is why do LLMs speak like that in the first place? Is that really what you get if you took the average of the English language? It would be difficult for me to believe that. Is there something about
12.
▲
by
ahepp
20d ago
I wonder if this is due to experience with reading technical documentation? I think the second requires deeper concentration, but is still quite readable compared to the kind of low-content engagement / SEO stuff one read on the intern
13.
▲
by
ahepp
22d ago
The zero 2 (W) seems pretty great if you just want a cheap linux device.
14.
▲
by
ahepp
23d ago
I get that a lot of immutable backup solutions are code, but they don’t have to be. You can do stuff like block writes in firmware or even blow fuses on the TX traces.
15.
▲
by
ahepp
29d ago
>mailing list discussion ( https://lists.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss/%3CDKSTMKM0ZD9N ....) That is certainly one way to decide what to do with the data your customers paid you to store...
16.
▲
by
ahepp
1mo ago
I think we should take the headline claim that "over 170k nonprofits lost all their data" with a huge grain of salt. As far as I can tell, the only source for that claim is: > And he later learned he wasn’t alone, when another
17.
▲
by
ahepp
1mo ago
> On Reddit, and across Microsoft’s own Tech Community forums, more such claims abound of surprise deletion without notification. I clicked the link with text “more such claims”, and it appears to be someone complaining about being unabl
18.
▲
by
ahepp
1mo ago
Will that necessarily be true in the future? Would we not expect that openrouter will develop the ability to negotiate special pricing?
19.
▲
by
ahepp
2mo ago
My understanding of it is also pretty surface level, but I was not under the impression that it develops "expertise" in a particular subject matter, at least not in a way that's easy to harness. From what I've read, it d
20.
▲
by
ahepp
2mo ago
> You can think of it like sharing. was this meant to read "sharding"?
21.
▲
by
ahepp
2mo ago
I understand that GitHub kinda ate the world on this, but using a branch PR as the basic unit of change seems like an arbitrary choice to me. Torvalds invented Git for work on the Linux kernel, and the basic unit of change there is commits
22.
▲
by
ahepp
2mo ago
I wonder if they could have added the ability to take only certain commits from a PR though? It kinda seems like they're duplicating the "unit of change" arbitrarily, rather than just fixing the way a PR works. I think the re
23.
▲
by
ahepp
2mo ago
I don't have experience with the stacked PR workflow and often find myself asking the same questions you are. As far as I can tell, the biggest benefit of stacked PRs over just making a coherent series of commits, is that it might make
24.
▲
by
ahepp
2mo ago
Yeah my phone was doing that for a while. I just took it as a sign that maybe I should spend less time on Reddit. After a while it stopped gating me. Not sure if that was a measured decision on their end, or just that the experiment ended.
25.
▲
by
ahepp
3mo ago
I got a gen10 plus microserver and liked it so much that I got a second one. Throw FreeBSD on it and add a couple lines to /etc/exports and rc.conf and it's a NAS right out of the box
26.
▲
by
ahepp
3mo ago
I'd probably just buy a cheap prebuilt PC with a big case, or surplus enterprise tower. You can get cheap LSI PCI cards and do miniSAS to SATA if needed. The biggest concern I'd have with USB is power delivery to the hard drives,
27.
▲
by
ahepp
3mo ago
I'm guessing you mean fuel injector? The pump that pushes or pulls fuel up from your tank is not very sophisticated, afaik. Fuel injector timing and quantity, along with ignition timing, is generally computer controlled, certainly on a
28.
▲
by
ahepp
3mo ago
I would love to hear more about this
29.
▲
by
ahepp
3mo ago
> rarely we get things wrong (e.g. classical physics) Curious, do you think quantum physics is the end of the line? I wouldn't claim to have a good understanding of anything beyond classical physics, but I've just assumed it&#x
30.
▲
by
ahepp
3mo ago
I would be interested to see benchmarks for that patch
More ›