ahenchan

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ahenchan 15y ago

   You are quite possibly right. And I don't mean to impugn NZ justice here because I have no additional information. Nonetheless I smell a rat. It should not be necessary to shoot themselves in the foot. Such cases so rarely happen that when
2. 2.▲
   by ahenchan 15y ago

   Same here. Thought I must be in the 90%. It depends on how the test was conducted.
3. 3.▲
   by ahenchan 15y ago

   The experimental design deliberately excludes this type of signal. Anonymous, non-repetitive, closed book. It is not an argument against social signalling. Just that there is something else going on too.
4. 4.▲
   by ahenchan 15y ago

   I have not read the original paper, but it seems plausible that the experimenters would have tried different game rules and this is the version which gives the reported result most strongly. On that assumption, one way to look at the experi