Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
afterburner5
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
afterburner5
7mo ago
tl;dr: the python library is here, if you give it a go, I'd love to hear about it https://github.com/DragosDumitrache/koalify
2.
▲
Show HN: Koalify – a compact predicate DSL for filtering any Python object
(dragos.dumitrache.dev)
4 points
by
afterburner5
7mo ago
|
1 comments
3.
▲
Show HN: GitOps SemVer Script
(github.com)
2 points
by
afterburner5
1y ago
|
0 comments
4.
▲
by
afterburner5
3y ago
Also considering that since the acquisition, they won't do anything to dissuade name-squatting anymore, despite their terms of service still suggesting otherwise
5.
▲
by
afterburner5
4y ago
So, if you're using Jira, Confluence is the obvious choice. However, I for one think it suffers from a big issue, i.e. discoverability. Because there's no tree-like hierarchy, it's quite difficult surfacing information unless
6.
▲
by
afterburner5
4y ago
When you're saying internal communication, do you mean, sharing informations with the wider group? Or just daily communication with your peers? A wiki is useful for capturing historical context, and for knowledge sharing. As the one st
7.
▲
by
afterburner5
4y ago
I worked for a company at some point where, due to the how the original product was built, testing before a release took between 3 and 5 days and was generally quite brittle. Within my first three months there, we had business requests to i
8.
▲
Honk: A generic webhook processor and notifier
(oneroar.io)
2 points
by
afterburner5
4y ago
|
1 comments
9.
▲
by
afterburner5
4y ago
Hey folks, A while ago I've started working on `Honk` primarily to aid me in my day to day work. Started small, notifying of the pull requests I am interested in, then moved onto Github discussions and failed CI checks. There are a few
10.
▲
by
afterburner5
4y ago
We're currently in the process of leveraging Github discussions for that.
11.
▲
by
afterburner5
4y ago
I know that, but what advantage do you get from trawling through a commit sequence, over the general feature with proper documentation? If you can't understand how the overall feature was implemented, that PR generally speaking is lack
12.
▲
by
afterburner5
4y ago
Louder, for the purists at the back!
13.
▲
by
afterburner5
4y ago
I can see where the author's coming from. However, my approach for a PR might be a bit of a mix. Normally, I aim to make a PR be reviewable, commit by commit. However, in some cases, due to a semicolon missing (you get the point), or s