afro88

22 ms·

421.
by afro88 3y ago
In my case executives were more focussed on how it could be built into new projects, presales etc rather than internal efficiency improvements. A lot of people were amazed to see someone getting value out of it (efficiency gains) without bu
422.
by afro88 3y ago
From the time of this post, Reddit has been having issues for 59 mins. It's currently down, saying their CDN is having issues reaching their servers.
423.
by afro88 3y ago
BASIC defaults to the tape device if you leave off the device number in LOAD/SAVE commands. So you can save another byte or two by saving to tape instead.
424.
by afro88 3y ago
I appreciate your point, and it's horrifying. I still wonder how many coding questions, stack overflow posts, comments on tech blogs etc just naturally have better responses to polite and clear discourse? SO is heavily moderated, and I
425.
by afro88 3y ago
Temp of 0 gives the least random and most predictable results
426.
by afro88 3y ago
> in the 90s it was all like that, just amen break over really dark metal/industrial kind of sounds There was actually a whole scene from the start of the 90s that focussed on melodic and atmospheric jungle and dnb. Check out Good L
427.
by afro88 3y ago
I know, I said: > I'm not saying scrum and agile achieve the above. Companies abuse scrum to try and achieve the last 2 objectives. Sprints become commitments, sprints are planned out in advance, story points become days etc
428.
by afro88 3y ago
What's the alternative, where devs are motivated and productive, the team can react to the market quickly, and the business can rely on delivery dates for commercial and marketing? I'm not saying scrum and agile achieve the above.
429.
by afro88 3y ago
I'm pretty sure OP was asking about the end user use cases. But I appreciate your reply because I'm developing a product and this made something click for me about letting users integrate with other things with minimal effort.
430.
by afro88 3y ago
Looks amazing and incredibly smart. But I found the LOC and implementation time comparisons to Twitter and Threads very disingenuous. It makes me wonder what other wool will be pulled over our eyes with Rama in future (or important real wor
431.
by afro88 3y ago
> these tokens often compete against each other for available spots in expert buffers. Hold up, does this mean that under heavy load the results change? Does this explain why it sometimes feels like the output quality changes?
432.
by afro88 3y ago
I was hoping this would be a way to train an LLM that somehow knew when to seek out external knowledge and when not to. I guess this is a pretty unsolvable problem with current architectures. There's just no concrete "confidence&q
433.
by afro88 3y ago
I was one if them. This post is what I was looking for in part 1.
434.
by afro88 3y ago
I had a similar impression. I also thought as you move into executive leadership things get much more strategic and you're rarely the one executing. But they list out lots of tactical experience and qualities that they say make them a
435.
by afro88 3y ago
Sure, generally speaking. Is that true for static, fixed parameter count LLMs like GPT4? I think you're hand waving a lot just to claim that OpenAI are (somehow) reducing accuracy of their models during high load. And I'm not sure
436.
by afro88 3y ago
Is that possible? I thought parameter counts were fixed in the model.
437.
by afro88 3y ago
How do you turn down the fit quality of a static model?
438.
by afro88 3y ago
Looks like they were talking mostly about call / contact centers. I'm assuming you are talking more about coding, in which case I agree.
439.
by afro88 3y ago
Has it been reversed already? I'm actively trying to hit the limit on my unverified account without success
440.
by afro88 3y ago
Except when you test that something is *not* an instance of something else and the test wrongly passes. Then you'll be scratching your head trying to fix a bug already in production.
441.
by afro88 3y ago
I've yet to see an AI bot that is both realistic and intelligent enough to keep me engaged (GPT4), but also can't be convinced that 1 + 1 = 3 (also GPT4)
442.
by afro88 3y ago
I think this is some kind of basic copyright control. It did the same thing for me a while back when I was experimenting with asking it for the introductory paragraphs for well known books. Think it was one of the harry potter books, from m
443.
by afro88 3y ago
I've found you still can't rely on LLMs to do anything 100% correct without human oversight. Unless you spend a lot of time prompt engineering and testing. Even then you might not get as close to 100% as you'd like. But as yo
444.
by afro88 3y ago
> but it still might overlook important subtleties If there's one thing we can be certain of, it's that LLMs often overlooks important subtleties. Can't believe they used GPT4 to also evaluate the results. I mean, we would
445.
by afro88 3y ago
If that also resulted in little or no change in how often you (and everyone) opened reddit each day, then it is a "success" for them. They have your eyeballs for longer, so you likely see more ads. If only they were trying to maxi
446.
by afro88 3y ago
Think of it like traditional code completion. It's mostly wrong but still useful. You either type through it, or tab/arrow to select the correct completion. AI code completion (like Github Copilot) is like this. Still a time saver
447.
by afro88 3y ago
And there's no way to give feedback that it's been miscategorised
448.
by afro88 3y ago
Understood, but how does an LLM actually know that the code it's spitting out already exists somewhere else that isn't public domain?
449.
by afro88 3y ago
But how does an LLM actually know and enforce this? It can be basically tricked into anything
450.
by afro88 3y ago
I'm starting to think that we need to think about prompt injection the same as prompt leaking: it's inevitable, and you have to build your feature in a way so it doesn't matter. So basically, tell your users that this is &quo

More ›