aflag

23 ms·

271.
by aflag 4y ago
That said, it's probably a much better investment to do supply chain sort of attacks than trying to trick people into downloading your pickled model. Although, I would be surprised if there aren't pickled models with some maliciou
272.
by aflag 4y ago
I think plenty bad guys have the necessary resources, but models tend to be just a large array of numbers. I think the main reason it's unlikely is just that there's not that much value in messing with your model. What are they re
273.
by aflag 4y ago
Very old software may gain an edge. However, that takes a while and depends on the number of people using the old software as well. For instance, Windows XP was a big target for decades after it had been superseded by newer versions of wind
274.
by aflag 4y ago
Those are reasons not to buy a mac for gaming, but if the engine also works in macs, isn't that a plus?
275.
by aflag 4y ago
Criticising the police is unlikely to get you in jail. Theoretically he was arrested for impersonating the police, which is a crime. It's just that when it's a clear parody, then it's not illegal. That is a bit nuanced, thoug
276.
by aflag 4y ago
The law is complicated, fluid and extense. There's no way a police officer will know the law like a lawyer and, by design, they can't know the outcome of a trial beforehand, so it's impossible to fully know the law in that se
277.
by aflag 4y ago
It would be an employee who intentionally deployed something to production. But that change turned out to be a mistake. Arresting people is the officer's job. This is a case where they arrested someone in error because they didn't
278.
by aflag 4y ago
I think QI is there to protect officers making a mistake in good faith. So a better analogy would be an employee who breaks production and that results in financial loss to clients.
279.
by aflag 4y ago
Why?
280.
by aflag 4y ago
Even though they were arrested by the police, the site was considered a parody by court and he was acquitted. The case in question is about whether the police was liable for wrongly arresting him, which the court found they are not
281.
by aflag 4y ago
So lie to get a job?
282.
by aflag 4y ago
I'm not skeptical or unskeptical. I just don't understand. My guess is that there's no construction if you understand what they are saying.
283.
by aflag 4y ago
More to it, from a layperson's point of view, that paragraph seems to contradict the headline. As they seemed to find COER mutants, albeit in low quantities, which I read as bacteria that could actually resist it? Maybe they are saying
284.
by aflag 4y ago
If the (ex-)maintainers work for google, they'd probably not do it. But, legally, they could.
285.
by aflag 4y ago
Doesn't fool fall in the same category?
286.
by aflag 4y ago
I'm a non-native English speaker. What's wrong with screeching?
287.
by aflag 4y ago
That was very popular back then. Besides the 404, it has the side effect that if that URL leaked, then your password system broke. With this implementation leaking the page is not a big deal (assuming you're not using it to store state
288.
by aflag 4y ago
I hope they do a UI overhaul. I've many times thought I had one army selected, but it was another and did the wrong thing. If it would just start a new turn with the same thing you had selected in the previous it would be an improvemen
289.
by aflag 4y ago
Having all those files around from an app I've used long ago feels really untindy to me. Even though, practically, it's ok. It still bothers. Feels like if you dispose of some old stuff by throwing them on the roof. Even though it
290.
by aflag 4y ago
Probably because it would make it cost more than $1000 while not being useful to most people.
291.
by aflag 4y ago
If moderation will just change the title to whatever is in the original article, why not just automate it? I'd hope that moderators would be able to decide whether or not the original title was better. In this case it clearly wasn&#x27
292.
by aflag 4y ago
Not sure if that follows. Just because preserving is more difficult, doesn't mean it has less value.
293.
by aflag 4y ago
Except that are actually able to kill people who come too close. If they just orbit around from a distance I'm sure we wouldn't be able to take them down. Not so sure about it if they actually enter our atmosphere
294.
by aflag 4y ago
I've tried using Spotify for podcasts, but the UI is abysmal. Simple features like the ability to play a single podcast without autoplaying the next are not available.
295.
by aflag 4y ago
In my experience most developers just want to reduce the cognitive load as much as possible. That sometimes means rewriting a lot of things so they make sense to them.
296.
by aflag 4y ago
I think you understimate how quickly things go bad in a hot humid climate.
297.
by aflag 4y ago
Even if the training is due an error that caused the incident, it doesn't say what the error was. I'm sure they didn't confuse their plane for a submarine.
298.
by aflag 4y ago
That’s not clear at all to me. Can you clarify?
299.
by aflag 4y ago
So are you arguing that being in orbit is not sufficient? Perhaps, but I'd say it's at least a necessary condition.
300.
by aflag 4y ago
I think it'd be hard to argue that something that's no even in orbit is not in a country's airspace.

More ›