affiliator

5 ms·

1.
Action Required: Stop the Internet Takeover Now(youtube.com)
3 points by affiliator 10y ago|1 comments
2.
by affiliator 10y ago
Well if they are blackwashing the image results, they would be blackwashing the regular results too. I am not 100% convinced but I think you're best argument is that a search for "european people" gives the results you would
3.
by affiliator 10y ago
so you are think websites containing the keywords 'portraits', 'Europeans', and 'people' happen to predominantly be talking about portraits of non-European people by Europeans?
4.
by affiliator 10y ago
There is a difference in the results for "portraits of European" and "portraits of Europeans". "portraits of Europeans" contains a large number of non-European faces.
5.
Are Search Engines Blackwashing Their Search Results?
10 points by affiliator 10y ago|9 comments
6.
by affiliator 15y ago
If I recall correctly, google+ started asking for ID scans.
7.
Google forcing date of birth request on login. (i.imgur.com)
5 points by affiliator 15y ago|2 comments
8.
by affiliator 15y ago
This post on reddit usually gets linked to when this question comes up over there: http://www.reddit.com/r/canada/comments/8zjv7/instructions_o...
9.
by affiliator 15y ago
any way to sign up without facebook? I don't have an account.
10.
23 & Me 'Upsell'(fellers.posterous.com)
1 points by affiliator 15y ago|0 comments
11.
by affiliator 16y ago
Couple it with a tablet, load up wikipedia and you're ready to beam aboard any passing Vogon spaceship.
12.
Hotfile, 1000 Users and PayPal Named In Piracy Lawsuit(torrentfreak.com)
1 points by affiliator 16y ago|0 comments
13.
by affiliator 16y ago
There are two parts to this issue, the most minor of which being that depictions of mohammed are forbidden. Indeed depictions of any prophet are frowned apon by the majority of muslims. Disney's 'The Prince of Egypt' was banned in many pred
14.
by affiliator 17y ago
Ireland a mixed bag? The British legitimately did some good things? You make it sound like the enslavement, genocide and the systematic extermination of their culture and national language was a charity. You must mean the railroads they ver
15.
by affiliator 17y ago
It's the author's way of explaining the Patriot act, that the FBI are allowed to monitor communications without seeking the permission of a court.
16.
by affiliator 17y ago
To be fair, the author perhaps does allude indirectly to the attacks by trying to point out a perceived hypocrisy of Google being willing to operate under the patriot act: To combat terrorism after the "9/11" terrorist attack, the U.S. has
17.
by affiliator 17y ago
It's interesting to read their spin.
18.
Google, do not take Chinese netizens hostage(english.people.com.cn)
33 points by affiliator 17y ago|45 comments
19.
by affiliator 17y ago
Recomment(?) from a reddit thread on the same story from someone who claims to work in cancer research: The chances that this antibody will work in humans is EXTREMELY small. The model that would have to be used here is injecting human pro
20.
by affiliator 17y ago
No need to apologize even if you did do it yourself. I checked your previous submissions and it is obvious you are not spamming HN. There is no shame in linking to a interesting product using an affiliate program. You are technically advert
21.
by affiliator 17y ago
While I'm not begrudging, it should be noted that DX links ending with ~r. and a number are affiliated to a particular user's account.