Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
aeve890
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
151.
▲
by
aeve890
11mo ago
Minor nit-pick but Hawking Radiation hasn't been observed and remains a theoretical prediction.
152.
▲
by
aeve890
11mo ago
>MAJOR BREAKTHROUGH ACHIEVED the bootlicking behavior must must be like crack for wannabes. jfc >I did not write a single line of code but carefully shepherded AI over the course of several days and kept it on the straight and narrow.
153.
▲
by
aeve890
11mo ago
Username checks out. >Open source terrorists Rust users and evangelism rubs me the wrong way. Yes it's safe, yes it's ergonomic but why the weird aura around the people that insist in "Rewrite it in Rust, Deus Vult"?
154.
▲
by
aeve890
11mo ago
What are the civilian applications?
155.
▲
by
aeve890
11mo ago
just one more accelerator bro. just one slightly larger accelerator than the one we just got online. we can revolutinize physics with just one more accelerator bro. Just give me 20 billion euros bro and we'll solve physics I promise br
156.
▲
by
aeve890
11mo ago
>use Microsoft Teams Shit like this make rogue AI scenarios totally plausible. I won't wish that on my worst enemy
157.
▲
by
aeve890
11mo ago
>The most striking addition: users are now explicitly forbidden from reverse-engineering or even attempting to understand how the platform works unless Arduino gives permission. Damn, like that's ever stopped the very people that li
158.
▲
by
aeve890
11mo ago
How would that prevent outages? Honest question
159.
▲
by
aeve890
11mo ago
It works so :shrug: I did the same to replace a part of a door frame I had to remove to make space for a washing machine 4 mm too wide. Nobody sell 400 mm of door frame so i just copied the frame shape, printed in 3 parts, and that was it.
160.
▲
by
aeve890
11mo ago
But what's the joke though?
161.
▲
by
aeve890
11mo ago
>The major objection is that its predictions are for things at a microscopic scale that we cannot yet test Yet? That's generous. String theory (whichever one you choose) works on the Planck scale regime, around 15 orders of magnitud
162.
▲
by
aeve890
11mo ago
>Downside would be the durability of the organic matter and replacement. thinking about the consequences of consumer grade "organic computing" gets weird really fast. How do you interface biological matter with peripherals? Wha
163.
▲
by
aeve890
11mo ago
> What is the point of C++ in 2025 except to maintain a large, existing source code base? Half of useful things to do are impossible or plain cumbersome to write in rust given the semantics and constraints of the borrow checker. Try to w
164.
▲
by
aeve890
11mo ago
>More sarcasm Please don't. The internet is already full of clowns trying to be the most sarcastic one in the thread.
165.
▲
by
aeve890
11mo ago
I'd recommend lazydocker, from the same author IIRC. Awesome TUI.
166.
▲
by
aeve890
11mo ago
Everyone thinks they're the intelligent ones, of course. Which reinforces the repetition ad nauseam of Dunning Kruger. Which is on itself dumb AF because the effect described by Dunning and Kruger has been repeatedly exaggerated and mi
167.
▲
by
aeve890
11mo ago
Maybe you could just, idk, provide your own diverse list?
168.
▲
by
aeve890
1y ago
>That's like saying you're thinking while asleep. Are you really? yes? when dreaming you're still thinking. you're still running cognitive processes and memories while in the dream.
169.
▲
by
aeve890
1y ago
I'm surprised that the simulation hypothesis is even falsifiable. I mean, the guys above are supposed to be in a totally different level of existence from ours, how can we even start to think we can debug the simulation? Wouldn't
170.
▲
by
aeve890
1y ago
Strictly speaking, it should work. We don't have a _real_ RNG yet and with the same seed any random function becomes deterministic. But behind the blackbox of LLM providers who know what's tunned processing your request. But my po
171.
▲
by
aeve890
1y ago
Unfortunately? May I ask why? What country would you like to be the lead in AI?
172.
▲
by
aeve890
1y ago
>The ways LLMs fail (and the techniques you have to use to account for that) have more in common than physical engineering disciplines than software engineering does! Ah yes, the God given free parameters in the Standard Model, including
173.
▲
by
aeve890
1y ago
I'd say this shit is even worse that "good at googling". Literal incantation for stochastic machines is like just two notches above checking the horoscope.
174.
▲
by
aeve890
1y ago
Are we still calling this things engineering?
175.
▲
by
aeve890
1y ago
>We're now moving to Talos. We PXE boot with Tinkerbell, image with Talos, manage configs through Flux and Terraform, and run conformance suites before each Kubernetes upgrade. Gee, how hard is to find SE experts in that particular
176.
▲
by
aeve890
1y ago
>It's quite possible that GI and thus AGI does not actually exist. Aren't we humans supposed to have GI? Maybe you're conflating AGI and ASI.
177.
▲
by
aeve890
1y ago
>No, don't use it to fix your grammar, or for translations, or for whatever else you think you are incapable of doing. Make the mistake. Feel embarrassed. Learn from it. Why? Because that's what makes us human! Fellas, is it an
178.
▲
by
aeve890
1y ago
Not the parent comment but what's your point? You can't use that common ground for anything, let alone communication, can you?. The fish wants to fuck? You want to too, what now? How do you stablish a common ground to understandin
179.
▲
by
aeve890
1y ago
>kooky hoobies >literally a Nazi lmao
180.
▲
by
aeve890
1y ago
Similar experience here. People laughed and some said something like "well, if something like AWS falls then we have bigger problems". They laugh because honestly is too far-fetched to think the whole AWS infra going down. Too big
More ›