aeve890

5 ms·

61.
by aeve890 3mo ago
>One big difference is that the US doesn't have much public record of using state espionage resources to steal industrial secrets to give domestic industry a leg up in the market, whereas CCP very much does. From Wikipedia > Brit
62.
by aeve890 3mo ago
>Obviously, the best move would be to keep the data in Europe instead. While 80% of Europe is subservient to the US?
63.
by aeve890 3mo ago
You have my curiosity
64.
by aeve890 3mo ago
You mean like Goodhart's Law? (Unless you're being sarcastic)
65.
by aeve890 3mo ago
DoD in short, to make it look like serious business
66.
by aeve890 4mo ago
It's absolutely not the same. If you think llms and brains works the same way you clearly don't know how either works. For a LLM learning what you wrote your last session would be update the weights with the new relationships and
67.
by aeve890 4mo ago
>It definitely learns things. By the very way this technology works they can't learn anything after training. What you think is "learning" it's just a session log written back to the context when you resume the sessio
68.
by aeve890 4mo ago
You're free to write your own media-conglomerate boot-licking post if don't agree.
69.
by aeve890 4mo ago
Is this article targeted just to an American audience? Because the US isolationism will only hurt them. Unless they truly have achieved AGI or ASI, the Chinese models soon will catch up. I'm pretty sure we will have an open weights fro
70.
by aeve890 4mo ago
>I wonder if our common expectation that true theories somehow had to be beautiful and elegant is going to survive the coming century. That's the layman's idea of physics theories. They are beautiful and elegant only on the sur
71.
by aeve890 4mo ago
>I wonder if there is any way to counter that. Not buying invasive shit?
72.
by aeve890 4mo ago
> ship around 3x to 5x faster Web apps and CRUDs, if may I ask? Or is AI helping you with something that you couldn't ever do by yourself? I have mixed results across different technologies like frontend, backend, infra and hardware
73.
by aeve890 4mo ago
>At AIs absolute best (rarely) it builds software like a very competent 9-5er. It's fine, it works, it's largely inoffensive. If only middle management and c-suite knew that
74.
by aeve890 4mo ago
The submitted site runs smoother, has less annoying popups, don't use the entire screen (on mobile) to show info of the selected startup and overall I think it has better UX than yours.
75.
by aeve890 4mo ago
I bet (pun intended) that's pretty good for the owners pockets
76.
by aeve890 4mo ago
>massive, historic accomplishment in creating digital scarcity accomplishment? like, something big and good?
77.
by aeve890 4mo ago
>TLDR it is quite a bad article You can write a rebuttal to address what's wrong with the article, from your point of view. Maybe I'm old but the whole "live reaction in twitch" thing doesn't help how the scienti
78.
by aeve890 4mo ago
Ha. When I found that problem I draw the grids and paths from the example, left for a coffee and when came back I just look at the drawings at an angle and thought "well this is just Pascal's triangle". And the solution was o
79.
by aeve890 4mo ago
>If you have a ton of capital That's my point. This "open source" doesn't feel like the real open source. It's open just for the few ones with ton of capital, and mostly in the US, or US adyacent markets. It&#x27
80.
by aeve890 4mo ago
Please correct me if I'm wrong, I'm totally out of my field here but what's the point of sota models that can be run only by hyperscalers? I mean, glm-5.2 is open source but with 1.5TB in weights who can run it really? It sti
81.
by aeve890 4mo ago
>Social credit bonus People does still believe this shit?
82.
by aeve890 4mo ago
Did you forget the /s ?
83.
by aeve890 5mo ago
Just send sms? Like video calls, custom emojis, reactions, groups, business accounts with online catalog and checkout process, channels, custom status, etc all that with sms? Come on now, get real. Maybe telegram or signal if you're g
84.
by aeve890 5mo ago
Oh wow you weren't joking.
85.
by aeve890 5mo ago
O(√t) looks weird but it's real. the "naive trial division" primality test for example.
86.
by aeve890 5mo ago
>... I was sure it was only good at autocomplete. Something happened earlier this year where the models hit a new level of capability. Yes, something happened, it got better at autocomplete. What else could be? The underlying model hasn&
87.
by aeve890 5mo ago
This is the OC classification of this type? I've seen it before but applied to corporate workforce. Also, clever and lazy at the very top? I don't get it.
88.
by aeve890 5mo ago
StarMaker is awesome but really exhausting to read.
89.
by aeve890 5mo ago
According to DSM V delusion is a key criteria to diagnose psychotic disorder.
90.
by aeve890 5mo ago
>Me not wearing a seatbelt means I risk getting splattered. Not you, or anyone else. Physics says otherwise. In a collision you don't decide where you body is yeeted and your skull could end inside the skull of a passenger using his

More ›