aennassiri

3 ms·

1.
by aennassiri 11d ago
Not sure if you see it coming: oh, but open-source models don't have a kill switch, so we should completely regulate them, stop their development, and forbid them. Everything should go through Anthropic for the sake of humanity because
2.
by aennassiri 12d ago
Indeed! I wasn't even able to change the bird easily. I like the initiative, though. I remember the whole bird migration from Africa to Europe and how it shapes the skies in autumn and spring.
3.
What if this is why humanity goes extinct?(aidoomday.com)
3 points by aennassiri 16d ago|4 comments
4.
by aennassiri 16d ago
AI doesn't need to want to take over. Give it autonomy; reading that it will is probably enough.
5.
by aennassiri 16d ago
If OpenAI remained a full nonprofit looking to build an "OPEN" AI for the benefit of all humanity (not only the US or a few shareholders), I would have been happy to share my code, my work, and even label their data... This said,
6.
by aennassiri 17d ago
It's funny that this is missing the negative effects or the possibility of an economic crisis scenario. Many data centers are being built by companies that won't exist in a few years, as the winner will take all. This is why XAI i
7.
by aennassiri 17d ago
My view of Meta changed positively when they started supporting the open-source LLM community again.
8.
by aennassiri 18d ago
Thanks Aerroon for sharing ! Banning social media is indeed an experiment and we don't know yet how efficient it will be.
9.
by aennassiri 18d ago
This is alarming. I believe it is probably a combination of several factors: - Social media and doomscrolling without sufficient parental controls: Several OECD countries are already addressing this by introducing or considering restriction
10.
by aennassiri 22d ago
I firmly believed OpenAI would take back the lead. It's healthy to have competition with Anthropic and, hopefully, other LLM providers. I'm excited to test their model. Their attitude towards developers/builders has been nice
11.
by aennassiri 23d ago
You tend to take a rather aggressive approach when commenting in here.
12.
by aennassiri 23d ago
To be more concrete, the last two examples were that Fable added every time a function called utcnow in newly added Python modules, and it always ended up adding constants. I'm saying it takes a lot of effort to make sure Fable or othe
13.
by aennassiri 24d ago
What are your arguments then ? What are your thoughts ? I use fable everyday and it is always coming up with changes on thousands of files for simple things, overall the code does the job but there is always marginal slop or unnecessary cod
14.
by aennassiri 25d ago
We will have more bugs. Even the best models with the best software engineers will produce bugs. There are two reasons : first the pressure to produce more and second LLMs will always produce slop
15.
by aennassiri 1mo ago
Xavier Niel did a lot of good to France