adamisom

18 ms·

181.
by adamisom 8y ago
Ok, but even then, surely it takes about as much time? The time component of having to go somewhere + get your order + get back is mysteriously ignored all. the. time. Not just with coffee, but with making your own food. Like, you don'
182.
by adamisom 8y ago
>it's imperative to spend time only on tasks that require critical decisions to be made, and to delegate the rest. Nobody ever points out the privilege in this statement. Someone has to be the unfortunate grunt getting delegated to,
183.
by adamisom 8y ago
I think relative status is implicit in your analogy. But doctors are higher status than software engineers... I think almost everyone would agree with that. Except maybe the HN crowd - but only if that software engineer is also an entrepren
184.
by adamisom 8y ago
Yes. It's also just a cliche word--I wonder what a better one would be: "open up" value/wealth? Too clunky.
185.
by adamisom 8y ago
So.. I'm guessing it's not as simple as it sounds for the biz to tag each recipe with each allergen-ingredient, and then exclude recipes on that basis for a given customer's list of allergens?
186.
by adamisom 8y ago
I'm not sure how applicable this is because of the nature of the AI beast. It took decades for asbestos to be banned and given how slow we were to collectively make the decision we might just be too slow in turning away from AI/ML
187.
by adamisom 8y ago
1) why would you think it wasn't clear to me? 2) this isn't about finding out if lichess has a different method of calculating ratings 3) furthermore, their different method for calculating ratings probably isn't why their ra
188.
by adamisom 8y ago
Nobody reads. The dude had a 10 year hiatus. Lichess didn't exist at the time. Most chess websites have had ratings roughly analogous to either USCF or to FIDE but lichess is the notorious exception.
189.
by adamisom 8y ago
I see the graph. When I first read it, I instantly inferred from that graph that they simply were adjusting to the lichess platform because (1) everybody starts with a rating of 1200 on chess.com and 1500 on lichess--the two biggest chess p
190.
by adamisom 8y ago
I like the points about studying in this article but its overall point is trash. Ratings across different websites are not the same thing! 2000 lichess is actually more like 1800 chess.com. I would know because that is my playing strength o
191.
by adamisom 9y ago
Wow dude I've been reading a lot of good things about Raiblocks lately. Thank you so much for any amount at all - xrb_3weozurdqazioyb1m9whby73ytp3xitowaqjaya8fjkefdqj9o4ikf575u51
192.
by adamisom 10y ago
Tim Urban is a great writer, but read something like this - http://lukemuehlhauser.com/a-reply-to-wait-but-why-on-machin... - if you want more nuance. (Caveat: It's been some time since I read either article, or about
193.
by adamisom 10y ago
You're talking about markets in a different sense. You're talking about the 'force-of-nature' market: the stark fact that positive-sum transactions can be made. stuaxos is talking about markets in situ, or reality. And i