actionowl

25 ms·

211.
by actionowl 8y ago
His tone is all wrong here: > You really don't need to respond to repeat what every other poster is saying. Obviously they did need to because no one from the team had responded yet. Also his response without any link to track the s
212.
by actionowl 8y ago
> This one neat trick can develop life, the void HATES it!
213.
by actionowl 8y ago
> Apart of that, they might pay someone to solve it for them. I think that can be solved by having the candidate talk about their solution and how they made certain choices.
214.
by actionowl 8y ago
> But not everyone has open source contributions In my experience, anyone we've hired WITH open source contributions has been 10x better than those without.
215.
by actionowl 8y ago
> 1) I just hire you after a 30 minute chat. 50% you don't work out, and we fire you after 30 days. Personally, that's my preference. If I don't think I can do the job I'll know after a 30 minute chat.
216.
by actionowl 8y ago
"CoreOS technology to combine with Red Hat OpenShift to drive hybrid cloud-native services, will power fully-automated Linux container platform stack, from the operating system to application services, across the hybrid cloud" Thi
217.
by actionowl 9y ago
> Those people don't carry that data with them You've made a great point here. What criminal is also going to carry their incriminating data with them? This isn't an effective policy. What problem does it actually solve?
218.
by actionowl 9y ago
We're google, we can pick any name we want, even if a very similar project is already using it. https://www.netbsd.org/docs/puffs/