acqq

77 ms·

661.
by acqq 6y ago
> you seem to be posting studies that did not pair HCQ with zinc I'm just posting studies that were the basis for what FDA decided June 15, 2020 (1): "FDA has revoked the emergency use authorization (EUA) to use hydroxychloro
662.
by acqq 6y ago
From that link: "AAPS files with the court a chart showing how countries that encourage HCQ use, such as South Korea, India, Turkey, Russia, and Israel, have been far more successful in combatting COVID-19 than countries that have bann
663.
by acqq 6y ago
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01824-5 "The [steroid] drugs suppress the immune system, which could provide some relief for patients whose lungs are ravaged by an overactive immune response that someti
664.
by acqq 6y ago
The picture is from https://science.sciencemag.org/content/368/6493/829 published "22 May 2020" at the time when less was known about Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine than today about treating Cov
665.
by acqq 6y ago
Living in the place where the list of "available networks" can never fit to a single screen of anything, I like the major point: "15. How to improve speeds Use Ethernet whenever possible"
666.
by acqq 6y ago
Not weird at all: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7jcBGLIpus Mick West's full playlist with explanations: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL-4ZqTjKmhn5Qr0tCHkCV... An article mentioning Mick Wes
667.
by acqq 6y ago
I have written a pair of compilers (not COBOL) myself, so at one moment I've thought about that possibility: "maybe I should spend a little time improving my COBOL knowledge and move to that niche." I wouldn't have probl
668.
by acqq 6y ago
The Saturday and Sunday are the "weird" death data in most of the countries, and not because people die less on these days, but because not all those that report the deaths do that on these days: even in hospitals in the middle of
669.
by acqq 6y ago
Yes, that's correct, thanks for finding it fast! I have obviously constucted the youtu.be link incorrectly: there should have been "?" instead of "&" in the link. The correct short form should be https:/&#
670.
by acqq 6y ago
Yes. And I believe it's not an accident, whenever I see an article posted on HN from nautil.us I expect that the science will be twisted to the point of inducing confusion, and I believe it's an "editorial policy" which
671.
by acqq 6y ago
I don't doubt that one can produce the picture. The problem is that these drawn lines over the real data don't mean anything. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rorschach_test
672.
by acqq 6y ago
> first silicon shipping in 2020 I've thought that's the Mac mini for devs? https://www.zdnet.com/article/the-mac-mini-will-be-the-first...
673.
by acqq 6y ago
As mentioned in the comments there, there's also now: https://github.com/tkchia/GW-BASIC "All files can now be assembled with Microsoft MASM 5.1A." "The interpreter is semi-working, but some parts o
674.
by acqq 6y ago
> "in 2020" really should be translated to "within 3-6 months of whenever arm64 Macs are first sold to the public" And I didn't even get the impression that it will be 2020 for anything non-devkit? Can anybody c
675.
by acqq 6y ago
> doesn't the CPU handle the caching of most used memory locations itself? Yes but caches aren't "never failing magic". You can imagine them as the mechanisms that allow saving some work in some scenarios. If the work
676.
by acqq 6y ago
> should I wait When somebody asks the question like that I always answer: wait. If somebody even asks something like this, it means to me that he/she doesn't need that at the moment . Otherwise he/she wouldn't even
677.
by acqq 6y ago
> I wrote that commit on my laptop. I was unable to reproduce this on my desktop. Then please modify the comment in the source to state that. The described behavior (the speed results unpredictably slightly changing in both directions) o
678.
by acqq 6y ago
As far as I see, the source code of the library is not plain C but .go, which is then transpiled to .c Anyway, even if what we see in the resulting .c is "just some missing string" it's not necessarily obvious how the strings
679.
by acqq 6y ago
Good story. Reminds me of a great story by Neil Stephenson about his experience of learning by doing the experiments: https://youtu.be/_J4QPz52Sfo&t=4511
680.
by acqq 6y ago
> Has AWK changed significantly in the last 30 years Actually it did, exactly the dialect used by the author of OP, Gawk got some very new and, in the context of awk language dialects, advanced features recently. https://www.g
681.
by acqq 6y ago
The creator of Zig language wrote a praise to musl: https://andrewkelley.me/post/why-donating-to-musl-libc-proje...
682.
by acqq 6y ago
Did anybody really find any reason to use that? https://www.pixelz.com/blog/guetzli-mozjpeg-comparison/ "MozJPEG files had fewer bytes 6 out of 8 times MozJPEG and Guetzli were visually indistinguishable MozJ
683.
by acqq 6y ago
I simply can't imagine that anybody who even basically understands the related topics could believe the facebook post you posted (I'm referring to the graph). If I'm wrong and they do exist I'm very, very sad, and even s
684.
by acqq 6y ago
It seems potentially a "call for help": "I appreciate help if this is the kind of rabbit hole you'd like to burrow in." The current status is of the conversion: "a lot of instructions being generated are invali
685.
by acqq 6y ago
The Onion's take on crows research: https://www.theonion.com/researchers-find-crows-smart-enough... "Researchers Find Crows Smart Enough Not To Let On How Smart They Really Are"
686.
by acqq 6y ago
I don't think that that inferred CV from the quote says anything about the "herd immunity" in the sense which most of people would like it to be. If you have an outbreak where people start to suffer, people react, they stop b
687.
by acqq 6y ago
> if 25% infected yields expected Rt of under 1 (the threshold for herd immunity, and I think this is likely) That's what I'm missing, what are your sources to think that? I somehow haven't seen that in the links you gave.
688.
by acqq 6y ago
It also manages to be unreadable with Reader view on iOS.
689.
by acqq 6y ago
Good, so we agree that nobody has proved for SARS-CoV-2 that less than 70% of can be infected to achieve the so-called "herd immunity" (even when knowing that different people allow some very lax definitions of "herd immunity
690.
by acqq 6y ago
I tried but I don’t see that the paper proved anything about the current pandemics?

More ›