Yes. And I believe it's not an accident, whenever I see an article posted on HN from nautil.us I expect that the science will be twisted to the point of inducin

Yes. And I believe it's not an accident, whenever I see an article posted on HN from nautil.us I expect that the science will be twisted to the point of inducing confusion, and I believe it's an "editorial policy" which stems from the fact that they are financed by John_Templeton_Foundation (1) "a philanthropic organization that reflects the ideas of its founder, John Templeton, who became wealthy after a career as a contrarian investor and wanted to support progress in religious and spiritual knowledge, especially at the intersection of religion and science." (2) Of course, I don't believe that every article has the same bias, but I saw it appearing with certain regularity. 1) http://nautil.us/about http://nautil.us/about 2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Templeton_Foundation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Templeton_Foundation