acct776

13 ms·

1. 151.▲
   by acct776 6y ago

   It's an incredibly similar case...
2. 152.▲
   by acct776 6y ago

   Please be sarcasm.
3. 153.▲
   by acct776 6y ago

   I disagree we are near to that, and believe if we don't keep an eye on their tactics and society, we will have them exported to us, upon us.
4. 154.▲
   by acct776 6y ago

   Haven't been following Macbook quality much, huh?
5. 155.▲
   by acct776 6y ago

   Succinct..agreed.
6. 156.▲
   by acct776 6y ago

   Comfort/efficiency..
7. 157.▲
   by acct776 6y ago

   Qemu/Spice
8. 158.▲
   by acct776 6y ago

   This is your idea of contributing to a conversation?
9. 159.▲
   by acct776 6y ago

   Downvoters, consider reading first: https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/linux.html
10. 160.▲
    by acct776 6y ago

    ...if you're a normal user. Or in charge of protecting them.
11. 161.▲
    by acct776 6y ago

    Being open source is not correlated with charging licensing fees. It just means you can read the source.
12. 162.▲
    by acct776 6y ago

    Assuming your source isn't a fucking mess, is commented, APIs documented, etc
13. 163.▲
    by acct776 6y ago

    No, it is not, by any stretch of the imagination, by security researchers. This has been on the front page all day: https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/guides/linux-harden... It is safe to assume it is more PRIVAT