abujazar

9 ms·

121.
by abujazar 3y ago
> SIP is secure boot for macOS. Not really. «Secure Boot» is intended to secure the boot process through signature verification. However the security model is completely broken, https://arstechnica.com/information-technol
122.
by abujazar 3y ago
This is good design. I love when developers are primarily designers.
123.
by abujazar 3y ago
I recently replaced my 4770K/3080 Ti rig with a 13600K and can wholeheartedly recommend the upgrade. Such an old CPU is not only keeping the GPU back, but load times etc are also like 10-50 times faster.
124.
by abujazar 3y ago
Good point
125.
by abujazar 3y ago
How do you end up with two identical SQL tables in the first place?
126.
by abujazar 3y ago
Noodle is a task management app for students, not an LMS : )
127.
by abujazar 3y ago
This is peak bullshit level.
128.
by abujazar 3y ago
Yea, that’s true as of today in the US. There’s no way you could get such a deal where I live (Norway) due to our weak currency, and it used to be the other way around just a few years ago
129.
by abujazar 3y ago
You’re right and my knowledge was outdated about the prices.
130.
by abujazar 3y ago
For $3000 you can get a top end GPU, not a whole gaming PC. Most gamers have mid-range GPUs like those in the M2 Max.
131.
by abujazar 3y ago
This is kinda funny. I worked on 400 MB+ files in Photoshop on a Mac with 128 MB memory in 1999.
132.
by abujazar 3y ago
But the pixels are visible, and text on those displays is so much less legible than on a 200+ ppi display. I simply don’t get how some developers find those monitors to be acceptable and at the same time disregard the Apple headset. Perhaps
133.
by abujazar 3y ago
The first question that pops into my head is why you’d work on a curved monitor (of which there still doesn’t exist a high resolution model) as a software engineer. Do you find the workspace on a single curved display sufficient? My primary
134.
by abujazar 3y ago
Same on Safari for iPhone… The page is completely illegible.
135.
by abujazar 3y ago
tl;dr; HTTP3 provides a little improvement, but optimizing search speed is much more important in this case.
136.
by abujazar 3y ago
At first glance this looks like official information, but in fact it's a campaign site from https://futureoflife.org and should be clearly marked as such.
137.
by abujazar 3y ago
BBEdit is still my go-to editor for plain text files, one-off regex text processing tasks and for ssh-ing into hosts to fix config files.
138.
by abujazar 3y ago
In my experience Laravel teams are WAY more productive than Quarkus teams though.
139.
by abujazar 3y ago
The 5.8 docs are like from like 7 or 8 years ago. I’d say the 10.x docs have improved a lot, but I do share some of your opinions on the docs in general. Anyone can contribute to them, though. https://laravel.com/docs/1
140.
by abujazar 4y ago
The original Mac was also snappier.
141.
by abujazar 4y ago
I love how LLMs have got the attention of proper programmers such that the Python mess is getting cleaned up.
142.
by abujazar 4y ago
The facts could be more clearly stated by defraining from stating open-source software as the cause.
143.
by abujazar 4y ago
Just like any author of MIT licensed open source software is clear about their license which clearly states they are not responsible in any way whatsoever for the shortcomings of their licensees.
144.
by abujazar 4y ago
Spot on
145.
by abujazar 4y ago
«Open source» was in the opening line of the statement as if it was something to blame.
146.
by abujazar 4y ago
I think it's fair to mention the bug originated in redis-py, but I don't find it relevant at all to mention «open-source» in the opening line of the public statement about the outage. Or «outside library» for that matter. It was C
147.
by abujazar 4y ago
Yes, and this is still the sole responsibility of OpenAI. They chose to include redis-py without warranties and are responsible for their own QA on any product built on it.
148.
by abujazar 4y ago
They're not blaming, legally speaking. But they're communicating that open source software caused their outage. OpenAI chose to use software that explicitly came without warranties, and are legally solely responsible for problems
149.
by abujazar 4y ago
I agree it's a good example – if not great. But considering OpenAI itself is as closed source as can be, mentioning open-source software as the cause of their outage in the very first line of their statement seems somewhat out of place
150.
by abujazar 4y ago
The disclosure is provides valuable information, but the introduction suggests someone else or «open-source» is to blame: >We took ChatGPT offline earlier this week due to a bug in an open-source library which allowed some users to see t

More ›