Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
abroszka33
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
abroszka33
3mo ago
Absolutely nothing. In fact I'm trying to enjoy the things I can while it lasts.
32.
▲
by
abroszka33
3mo ago
Yes, and Google purchased the technology, did not invent it.
33.
▲
by
abroszka33
3mo ago
That used to be once in a lifetime event. Now we have temperatures like that two or three times every decade and soon it's going to be a normal summer temperature.
34.
▲
by
abroszka33
3mo ago
Yeah, that seems like our only realistic solution to the climate crisis.
35.
▲
by
abroszka33
4mo ago
No, but did any of the other big companies? Google literally found the transformer architecture but had no idea what to do with it.
36.
▲
by
abroszka33
4mo ago
As a European I still prefer US over China.
37.
▲
by
abroszka33
4mo ago
The baseline is forever gone. Good luck convincing people to contribute to StackOverflow v2 after this.
38.
▲
by
abroszka33
4mo ago
I'm not convinced that me copying is making it easier for the next guy to copy it. But you are asking the right question. And if the AI hype is real then the customer won't pay the big company premium for software and even small o
39.
▲
by
abroszka33
4mo ago
That was true before. Who wants to live on their saving for three years to build a product that might flop and do all the extra accounting and legal stuff. But now it takes 3 months with AI, making a business and charging money has never be
40.
▲
by
abroszka33
4mo ago
They should think about what happens when expectations are so high that a single dev must deliver and maintain multiple products. What stops that single dev from leaving and offering the same product on his own.
41.
▲
by
abroszka33
4mo ago
I'm not sure this is a real problem. Google/Apple already has the world mapped out thanks to our photos in the cloud, and we literally let Tesla and others drive cars everywhere recording everything. Pokemon Go does not really inc
42.
▲
by
abroszka33
4mo ago
Ok, I guess there are some weird benchmarks where they managed to squeeze out an exponential. But even with Google's, OpenAI's or Anthropic's own benchmark it's a linear improvement between models.
43.
▲
by
abroszka33
4mo ago
> He wrote this in 2024 before reasoning models came out. Remember how ChatGPT was in 2024? Do you think this person is someone who gets predictions right? Any benchmark on AI shows that it gets better linearly. So his prediction was cor
44.
▲
by
abroszka33
6mo ago
OpenAI said that GPT-5 was too dangerous to release... And look where we are now. It's mostly hype.
45.
▲
by
abroszka33
6mo ago
That's definitely a lot of work. That consuming a week worth of tokens sounds reasonable.
46.
▲
by
abroszka33
6mo ago
How are you using it to reach the limit so quickly? I'm 13% at a 10x plan and I have used it for hours every day for the last 5 days. I never hit a limit.
47.
▲
by
abroszka33
7mo ago
I think I would like that as well. The problem is that if we bake an LLM into HW and make it cheaper and very efficient to run, then all games will have the same AI slop content, which could get boring pretty fast. The alternative is that t
48.
▲
by
abroszka33
7mo ago
I'm pretty sure that by now almost everybody know that anything you put online is monetised. I'm also 100% sure they sell my location data as well. I just don't care. Not my responsibility to stop it.
49.
▲
by
abroszka33
7mo ago
But this is images. I submitted it one time and I'm pretty sure that was hundreds of images. You basically walk around the POI and it takes a LOT of images of the POI. 600 scans / player would be insane.
50.
▲
by
abroszka33
7mo ago
Haha :D Good tip, I will try that too.
51.
▲
by
abroszka33
7mo ago
I like Pokemon Go and play almost every day. I did this scan one time and then stopped. The rewards are not worth the hassle. I don't think many players are doing it. It's just very weird to stand somewhere and scan an object. I a
52.
▲
by
abroszka33
7mo ago
I'm not sure. How common is it to review the outsourced development team's code? My guess is that there is rarely any review. They usually ship the whole software and are responsible for it.
53.
▲
by
abroszka33
7mo ago
Even if they have an army of senior engineers, reviewing AI generated code is fundamentally different than reviewing code written without AI. The change is usually larger, looks good on the surface and there are stupid mistakes in it. It&#x
54.
▲
by
abroszka33
9mo ago
Who cares, it's my browser, it is for me to decide what I run, not for eBay. LLM, AdBlock or whatever else I want I will run it.
55.
▲
by
abroszka33
10mo ago
It's usually the children's safety, porn, piracy or protection from some foreign enemy. But does it really matter?
56.
▲
by
abroszka33
10mo ago
> If you really don't care you might voice a quiet objection and then just implement the garbage your boss asked for. This works in theory, but the problem is that some jobs are complex and require thinking. These jobs will attract
57.
▲
by
abroszka33
10mo ago
> Why are you pretending like going to an office and speaking to coworkers to solve problems for customers is hard? Nobody is saying that. That's super easy to do and most people love it.
58.
▲
by
abroszka33
11mo ago
> Trust me, try it, try Claude 3.7 > 4.0 > 4.5 > Opus 4.5 ... I started with Sonnet 4 and now using Opus 4.5. I don't see a meaningful difference. I think I'm a bit more confident to one prompt some issues but that
59.
▲
by
abroszka33
11mo ago
I agree, I have over 20 years of software engineering experience and after vibe coding/engineering/architecting (or whatever you want to call it) for a couple months, I also don't see the technology progressing further. LLMs
60.
▲
by
abroszka33
11mo ago
Because US already has it. Did everyone forgot about Snowden? They have the ability and they are actively using it for at least the past 12 years. There is a reason that every major cloud provider is building a European sovereign cloud now,
More ›