abraham_s

13 ms·

91.
by abraham_s 14y ago
If you are talking about people who get hired in India, then yes they continue to work for Infosys. I am not sure about what will happen to people who get hired in the US(like international students). Companies like Infosys are large enough
92.
by abraham_s 14y ago
I have seen similar email "storm" a couple of times when I was working in HP. It was not the whole of the company but a large business group probably a tenth of the company. It would start with a mail send to a large email list. People woul
93.
by abraham_s 14y ago
The current protest is not against anything in particular. Repetition of such incidents,to brutality of this particular case and the harassment women face on a daily basis made this the last straw that broke the camel's back. The call for
94.
by abraham_s 14y ago
>The fact that you are fluent in English and have internet access suggests that you much more educated and wealthy than the average Indian. I agree I cannot speak for the poor in India. Both my parents were employed and my annual income
95.
by abraham_s 14y ago
I agree that China has made faster progress than India. But attributing this difference to "democracy" vs "one party rule" is too simplistic. 1) India is much more diverse than China. With each state having its own language,it is a wonder t
96.
by abraham_s 14y ago
The problem is not democracy but "an inefficient and unequal democracy". Rampant corruption exacerbates the problem. The problem with India is a failed law enforcement system and overwhelmed judicial system. It is very easy to bribe your wa
97.
by abraham_s 14y ago
There are some factual inaccuracies in your post Anovikov. <<<If it tries, it will result in the same thing as when it tried to limit birth rate in Indira Gandhi times - which eventually cost her life. >>> The forced
98.
by abraham_s 14y ago
Another example would be India,where top-tier colleges are almost always government owned.
99.
by abraham_s 14y ago
>>>and to put the administration of federal elections in the hands of an independent, professional, non-partisan electoral commission. Even if you have a federal electoral commission, the "foot soldiers" who will be working in t
100.
by abraham_s 14y ago
"Best" is as defined by the selector i.e the schools. Whether the method chosen to rank the applicants truly measures what the selector wants to be measured is the real question. In other words whether the school end up with the best test t
101.
by abraham_s 14y ago
The real question to be asked is that whether the tests are serving the intended purpose i.e that of finding the best students of the lot (best can be defined as being most knowledgeable of the subject being tested). A student with experien