ablekh

37 ms·

421.
by ablekh 7y ago
Interesting, thank you for sharing.
422.
by ablekh 7y ago
You're very welcome!
423.
Keyless Crypto: How Do Bob, Alice and Carol Share a Secret Message?(medium.com)
2 points by ablekh 7y ago|2 comments
424.
Can Twitter Save Science?(alexdanco.com)
2 points by ablekh 7y ago|0 comments
425.
Stop!! You don’t need Microservices.(medium.com)
5 points by ablekh 7y ago|0 comments
426.
by ablekh 7y ago
Nice post. I've enjoyed reading it as much as discovering your other blog posts and projects (especially, PySwarms). Keep it up! :-)
427.
by ablekh 7y ago
Ah, sweet Delphi ... To this day, it remains the best visual development environment that I have experienced over 25+ years. Powerful - yet intuitive and simple - UI, blazingly fast compilation speed, rich sets of built-in and third-party v
428.
by ablekh 7y ago
Thank you for the suggestion. Will definitely take a more detailed look at F#. I have read about it some time ago, including some very positive general feedback. However, even if F# is an excellent fit feature-wise, I can see two potential
429.
by ablekh 7y ago
How would you compare special features, if any, as well as advantages (and disadvantages) of using C# for developing an embedded DSL versus using Julia macros for the same purpose versus using specialized toolsets (e.g., MPS) for developi
430.
by ablekh 7y ago
Thank you for sharing your helpful insights. I will continue learning Julia as well as exploring and comparing options (in addition to Python and Julia, I'm also considering Node.js and C#, though to a lesser degree). I have certainly
431.
by ablekh 7y ago
Your blazingly fast and thoughtful comment is much appreciated. Let's see what others have to say ... :-) One clarification that I would like to make (which IMO diminishes your second point's potential value) is that the B2B SaaS
432.
by ablekh 7y ago
Interesting post and excellent discussion. I have the following question to all Julia and/or Python experts here. What strategy for developing a cloud-native {science and engineering}-focused platform would be better, in your opinion,
433.
by ablekh 7y ago
I see. Thank you very much for clarifying. Will reach out to you when the time is right ... :-)
434.
by ablekh 7y ago
Understood. I appreciate your prompt reply and will keep it in mind. Based on the numbers that you shared above, it seems that you typically co-invest , but prefer other VC firms to lead in a seed round. Correct? If so, do you expect to
435.
by ablekh 7y ago
Hello Leo, quick question, if you don't mind: do you invest in pre-MVP pre-seed (idea validation phase; deep tech) and pre-revenue seed (MVP-build-in-progress or MVP-ready phase) companies?
436.
by ablekh 7y ago
Nice, but very simplistic (on purpose, it seems), write-up on the topic. For a much more comprehensive and excellent coverage of designing & implementing large-scale systems, see https://github.com/donnemartin/syste
437.
by ablekh 7y ago
Thank you for sharing your experience. How different is gVisor from containerd? Pros/cons?
438.
Ask HN: Alternative container technologies for K8s in production?
3 points by ablekh 7y ago|2 comments
439.
by ablekh 7y ago
Understood. This IMO is a bit of a shaky ground, because, while still being (or being perceived as) a cloud leader - though Azure a formidable competitor across the cloud spectrum - AWS is definitely not a leader in the managed K8s area (wh
440.
by ablekh 7y ago
They surely can. But so is true for Azure and GCP as well. Thus, I'm curious about whether it is a feasible pricing strategy for AWS, considering the fact that EKS is not much different from their competition's managed K8s offerin
441.
by ablekh 7y ago
Why do you think AWS charges for K8s master nodes (control plane), when both of their major competitors do not?
442.
by ablekh 7y ago
Considering cost sensitivity, I highly recommend to consider Proxmox VE (Virtual Environment), which is a high-quality open source virtualization software for hyper-convergent infrastructure with an optional subscription, which is very mode
443.
by ablekh 7y ago
I agree with you that purpose in life is very important. However, your assumption above about Denmark is not supported by The World Happiness Report ( https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2019 ): both in 2019 and 2018, Den
444.
by ablekh 7y ago
Please clarify whether Chargebee supports custom hybrid plans (e.g., Per Seat + Usage models in Stripe terminology, which, correspondingly, would approximately be equal to a combination of Per Unit + Volume + Tiered models [1]). If Yes, ple
445.
by ablekh 7y ago
I remember using it a bit in my Delphi days ... (nostalgic face) It just worked (for smallish projects) and was quite nice, though nothing ground-breaking. > How is it that it's so little known among developers? Both Interbase and,
446.
by ablekh 7y ago
I appreciate your clarifications. Until now, I was aware of [0], but not [1] and [2]. Your implementation seems be much more popular than both the new alternative and a reference implementation. The (general and scientific) workflow engines
447.
by ablekh 7y ago
You're welcome. Happy to help.
448.
by ablekh 7y ago
1. Is Gravity a fully open source software (with commercial support) or an Open Core software? If the latter, please point to a feature matrix or relevant part of documentation. 2. How Gravity solution (and/or approach) is different fr
449.
by ablekh 7y ago
Hi there, it's my pleasure! Happy to help. While each of the approaches that I mentioned above is best suitable for certain types of companies (and circumstances), the list as a whole is generic and comprehensive enough. Re: CapEx&#x2F
450.
by ablekh 7y ago
All right, good luck! Please share your Hetzner experiences here - I will be watching this thread.

More ›