Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ablekh
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
45 ms
·
451.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
Hetzner's pricing for dedicated servers is impressive. However, I'm curious about how do you deal with (or whether you are worried about) the lack of their presence in North America, Asia, Oceania? Unless most of your customers ar
452.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
Excellent write-up and interesting story - thank you for sharing. I'm wondering about whether Buildium had to restructure itself from LLC to C Corporation prior to the first VC round (or subsequent rounds). VCs very rarely invest in LL
453.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
Well, there are several available options, as follows: 1. Bootstrap first, then raise one or more VC rounds. 2. Go typical VC route (angel/pre-seed/seed, Series A, etc.), but skip a round or, better, two. 3. Establish a multi-clas
454.
▲
Computer programming today versus 20 years ago
(medium.com)
2 points
by
ablekh
7y ago
|
0 comments
455.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
I partially agree. However, the key word in your comment is "simple". While, obviously, it is subjective, in my opinion, presented diagrams are hardly very simple (though, they are not that complex either). Yes, they are readable,
456.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
Exactly. I'm pleased to finally hear from someone with a similar UX taste. :-)
457.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
You are welcome! As the author, of course, you are free to do whatever you want with your content. I was just sharing my friendly suggestion, based on my experience and UX taste ... :-)
458.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
Well, it seems that our opinions on legibility of visual artifacts differ. It is harder to read, a) because of coarseness of diagrams' elements and b) because of additional mental effort needed to comprehend such an artifact as a whole
459.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
Nice write-up. However, I would strongly recommend to replace your text-based diagrams, which are difficult to read, with ones produced by relevant tools (e.g., draw.io or a wonderful Mermaid project: http://mermaid-js.github.io&
460.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
I appreciate you sharing your insights and references. Will definitely research on relevant aspects and linked projects.
461.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
Quick question, since we are on the topic: do you think that it is a feasible (or even the optimal) approach to first develop an MVP, using a very productive, but much less performant, language (Python) and then, upon reaching a product-mar
462.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
This aspect (variability of requirements spectrum) is exactly why Julia language seems to be extremely attractive in that it represents an excellent and unique solution to the "two-language problem". The only issue that I'm s
463.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Just curious: If you were tasked with architecting and implementing a semantic layer for a complex SaaS platform in a large domain from scratch, what would be your approach and what technology stack woul
464.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
With all potential advantages of semantic technologies, I'm wondering about whether their adoption is slowed down by performance issues of inference engines (reasoners) on very large (> 100B of nodes) datasets (e.g., AWS has decided
465.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
Thank you for sharing your experience. Do you use a more or less well-known toolset like MPS or Xtext or it is some kind of a custom framework? Any lessons learned and best practices regarding external DSL design and development?
466.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
I'm curious about whether there is a large skills overlap between engineers working on compilers and embedded DSLs (for the case of external DSLs, such an overlap would IMO be quite significant). By the way, are there any people here (
467.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
I would recommend you to consider the following "simpler-than-Kubernetes" containerized workload orchestrators: Swarm ( https://github.com/docker/swarm ) and somewhat more complex Nomad ( https://gith
468.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
That's great, thank you!
469.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
I see. This certainly could be used by SMB companies, which do not require (some or many) enterprise features, but still have sizeable codebases, teams and levels of activity. My point was that it is probably a good idea to spend time on pe
470.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
I agree - some focus definitely makes sense, but I was talking about the author mentioning spending "a lot of time" on this.
471.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
Great work, congratulations! Will definitely give it a try. Having said that, this project needs data import/export functionality (certainly for GitLab and GitHub; perhaps, also for less popular options, e.g., Bitbucket, Gitea and Gogs
472.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
It's my pleasure! Thank you for the clarifications. I will definitely follow your efforts. :-)
473.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
Looks interesting. Good luck! Couple of questions: 1) why did you decide to create your own graph query language instead of trying to follow recent graph query languages standardization trend (e.g., see https://www.tigergraph.com
474.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
"When the transaction closes later this quarter, Packet will continue operating as before: same team, same platform, same vision. Our commitment to our customers ..." -- The question is how long before Equinix decides to chang
475.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
Abstracting away from this specific case, it is IMO just another example of potential very significant and real risks of being reliant upon cloud or, more generally, technological platforms operated by potentially acquirable companies. Whil
476.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
Understood. Though I would expect some overlap between the first two markets. I'm curious about reasons and rationale, underlying potential differences between valuation and/or multiples within relevant categories. Any pointers or
477.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
I was definitely talking about the first category (though not necessarily public only; AFAIK there are some [many?] private companies that fit that profile). I agree that those revenue multiples are high, though I'm not sure I would re
478.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
My pleasure. Re: commercial AuthN/AuthZ services - I definitely understand your rationale (though I've seen some passionate opinions of the opposite nature; not only Auth-related, but generally, in the vein of "outsource as m
479.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
Hmm ... Where did you get these multiples from? Based on what I've seen in many sources (here's one that I have at hand, by McKinsey: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-cor... ), high-gro
480.
▲
by
ablekh
7y ago
Hi, there! Understood, thank you for the clarification. I guess, I've somehow missed mention of that bonus section. Two more suggestions for more comprehensiveness: consider updating this course with a content addressing 1) using alter
More ›