ablekh

36 ms·

271.
by ablekh 6y ago
Fair enough. Thank you, will keep this in mind.
272.
by ablekh 6y ago
Thank you for your advice. The Syncfusion Community License is certainly interesting and I will keep it in mind (as well as Radzen). Though, frankly, I don't like these "lure into an ecosystem/platform/product with free
273.
by ablekh 6y ago
Great feedback, much appreciated! I'm familiar with Microsoft for Startups program and I'm still considering it, though currently it's not a priority. I agree with most of your thoughts above. Don't have experience with
274.
by ablekh 6y ago
Much appreciate your feedback and advice. I was considering using F# instead C# for my potential .NET-based solution. But not because of Microsoft's ML push for F# (which seems to be just a move to achieve feature parity with C# within
275.
by ablekh 6y ago
Thank you for your feedback. When I said "predominantly an enterprise-focused technology" , I meant overall popularity for building in-house enterprise products versus developing startup products. Anyway, should I decide to use .
276.
by ablekh 6y ago
I appreciate your prompt feedback with interesting details. Re: Blazor - while it's definitely a promising technology, I'm not sure how suitable it is for building SPAs. One potential issue that I can see is quite limited (and IMO
277.
by ablekh 6y ago
Has anyone here used (or are familiar with relevant cases of using) .NET for developing startup products, including MVPs? With some exceptions, I'm seeing .NET as predominantly an enterprise-focused technology. Strategizing about devel
278.
Lambda – A Serverless Musical (Hamilton “My Shot” Parody)(youtube.com)
1 points by ablekh 6y ago|0 comments
279.
by ablekh 6y ago
Related read (a reminder on the history of the original acquisition): https://www.wired.co.uk/article/softbank-vision-fund .
280.
9/11: Ten Years Later(youtube.com)
1 points by ablekh 6y ago|0 comments
281.
by ablekh 6y ago
Never heard about it before seeing your comment. However, I have just looked it up and I think that the very limited scope (both temporal and geographical) of this "movement" just additionally emphasizes and supports the points th
282.
by ablekh 6y ago
If you are OK with a text being not that bad, hmm ... it is your choice. Readability is an extremely important UX concept, not to mention the accessibility in this case. For the current version of the text, people with less than great eye
283.
by ablekh 6y ago
> Deeper in this thread you state this is somehow worse UX, and makes the text less readable. I... don't see how it's any less readable, could you elaborate? Sure. I argue that this "style" provides poor UX due to dec
284.
by ablekh 6y ago
I think that you and I are talking about different "readabilities". Yours implies a capability to effectively convey conceptual meaning, whereas mine (in this context) implies UX-focused - that is, purely visual - readability of t
285.
by ablekh 6y ago
This issue is not about conveyance , but rather about readability . As simple as that. So, let's agree to disagree. :-)
286.
by ablekh 6y ago
I did not say anything about grammar or even punctuation (in general). I have voiced a specific concern of a complete disregard of a proper capitalization. If you call it a "self-expressive style", well, it is your opinion and, of
287.
by ablekh 6y ago
bEcAuSe pRoPer cApItAlIzAtIoN iS iMpOrTaNt fOr rEaDaBiLiTy ;-)
288.
by ablekh 6y ago
If this is your argument supporting this trend, then I'm speechless ...
289.
by ablekh 6y ago
Perhaps, I'm dumb as rock, but what does your comment have to do with what I originally wrote above?
290.
by ablekh 6y ago
The lack of attention to (or, rather, the complete disregard of) proper capitalization is ridiculous. This is the second post I'm seeing in two days that feature this "style". Quite a disturbing trend, if you ask me.
291.
by ablekh 6y ago
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I'm not worried about scaling and other aspects, but I do think about them. In my opinion, architectural decisions are the most important ones (across technological dimension) and fixing wrong or su
292.
by ablekh 6y ago
I hear you. :-)
293.
by ablekh 6y ago
Very interesting. I much appreciate your prompt and detailed comment. You clearly know the art and craft of consulting quite well.
294.
by ablekh 6y ago
Kudos on excellent comments and advice (here as well as in your other reply below). I'm curious about your thoughts on productized consulting, if any.
295.
General Motors will engineer and build Nikola’s hydrogen pickup(arstechnica.com)
2 points by ablekh 6y ago|0 comments
296.
by ablekh 6y ago
Fair enough. However, this use case is far beyond the subject and scope of the post at hand. :-)
297.
by ablekh 6y ago
You're very welcome! BTW, do you have any interest in and time for potential consulting or advisory for a frontier/deep tech startup (ambitious goals, challenging tasks, great impact)? Not an immediate need, but, hopefully, it wil
298.
by ablekh 6y ago
It's my pleasure. I agree - it's a good idea to present both perspectives and allow readers to decide what works best for them. I can certainly understand you being hesitant to add more content to an already sizeable post. Perhaps
299.
by ablekh 6y ago
I'm sure that eGPU enclosure manufacturers will eventually produce models fully compatible with GeForce RTX 30 series. In the meantime, FYI there are some relevant discussions regarding potential compatibility (with pin adapters) of so
300.
by ablekh 6y ago
You're welcome! While I understand your rationale now, I'm afraid I still disagree with it. :-) Simply because I find it very unlikely that people interested in and having enough skills to embark on any reasonable deep learning jo

More ›