abiox

18 ms·

241.
by abiox 9y ago
i don't think so either. at least, i haven't really seen it.
242.
by abiox 9y ago
> There is also the fuzzy line between there isn't necessarily a line. if you keep "trying to get laid" after being told someone wasn't interested, you're doing both.
243.
by abiox 9y ago
> All the men really, all of them? or just ones you've seen on [WhateverNewsSite].com? i suspect a situation at, say, a random local hardware store is unlikely to make major news outlets.
244.
by abiox 9y ago
while i'm very skeptical of cloud-only smart-home devices, i'm absolutely all in on the general premise. i want to have every even remotely conceivable automation and assistance at my whim. if there isn't a secure lan-only
245.
by abiox 9y ago
to varying degree, syntax matters. (for better or worse.) the nice thing is that the semantics of ocaml haven't been changed by reasonml.
246.
by abiox 9y ago
based on context i suspect they were talking about the use of initialisms, rather than proper/full names.
247.
by abiox 9y ago
what does it mean to be "the ann coulter of economics"? do you mean having a propensity to make inflammatory comments? (wikipedia claims he supports the british Labour Party, so i'd wager their politics are quite different.)
248.
by abiox 9y ago
> If they can do that then the whole method fails anyway. i'm not that sure. the memory of any application can be observed, which means the process of fingerprinting - whatever it is - can be observed. executing the process enough
249.
by abiox 9y ago
i signed up with facebook (with a unique email), and encountered this. i used a picture (a painting, rather) of george washington. it seemed to work at first, but when i tried logging in a month or two later my account was disabled. perha
250.
by abiox 9y ago
> allow you to compute the hash locally presumably an attacker will just use the local process to observe and develop a method to defeat it. that said, perhaps such a methodology would require extra effort on the part of a revenge porn p
251.
by abiox 9y ago
> There are way better and safer and less invasive ways in theory or in practice? do these ways have other caveats?
252.
by abiox 9y ago
> compute a fingerprint locally one downside: i think this could allow a bad actor to directly observe the fingerprinting and assist in developing a method to defeat it.
253.
by abiox 9y ago
well, consider that basically everything is constituted by chemical compounds (an apple contains stuff like epicatechin, phloridzin, quercetin, etc.)
254.
by abiox 9y ago
> It depends if you want "yes" men, or people to disagree with you. having an opinion and outright insubordination are two entirely different things. the former is fine, while the latter is toxic and destructive. > Remember
255.
by abiox 9y ago
i would be convinced, if i was the lead's boss' boss, to consider firing him. if they refuse to support those upon whom they place responsibility, it's unlikely you can trust and rely on their support of you.
256.
by abiox 9y ago
they've already left in a sense, if you've got responsibility but not authority.
257.
by abiox 9y ago
perhaps this is why some people think it's "just fine" to undercut someone's authority while giving no mind to their responsibility.
258.
by abiox 9y ago
(In the US,) You generally can't fire someone from the military, at least not without a lot of effort and paperwork.
259.
by abiox 9y ago
insubordination may also be. it's well established as grounds for termination, and it could be a necessity in this situation.
260.
by abiox 9y ago
> if you're making $10k/mo writing code on it hah... if only the world was silicon valley.
261.
by abiox 9y ago
> it wasn't the bullshit that caused its downfall this wasn't stated, so i don't understand your complaint. the post even says " Bullshit might get you to the top, but it won’t keep you there. "
262.
by abiox 9y ago
> ... logical contradictions such as both the rise and the fall of the Soviet Union were bad. they can both be bad, it's just that "the bad" is different in each case.
263.
by abiox 9y ago
i don't see what you see, so i can only attribute your interpretation to your biases/assumptions/worldview. aside from wondering at motives, perhaps you should also wonder why your interpretations are what they are.
264.
by abiox 9y ago
inaccessible for whom? the public internet isn't the only (inter)network that exists.
265.
by abiox 9y ago
what is the difference, and why is the difference noteworthy such that you wonder about it?
266.
by abiox 9y ago
> I see no issue with the education system. You can learn anything you want on demand, for what is basically no cost whatsoever (other than your time and minor incidentals), with virtually no barrier to entry. are you referring to the in
267.
by abiox 9y ago
> that would mean you would have confusion does this confusion not exist now?
268.
by abiox 9y ago
i don't think that "product" and "customer" are exclusive notions, nor that "community" would only apply to just one of those notions.
269.
by abiox 9y ago
what do you mean by "racist advantages"?
270.
by abiox 9y ago
> using his money to reduce the need for the security he's implementing how would that be accomplished? ostensibly, the money's existence is what creates that need. perhaps you mean he should give it all away?

More ›