4 ms·
> There are way better and safer and less invasive ways in theory or in practice? do these ways have other caveats?
by abiox 9y ago
> There are way better and safer and less invasive ways
in theory or in practice? do these ways have other caveats?
- musage 9y agoThe only safe way is to not take nude pictures in the first place. What does this FB thing protect against? In practice? Upload the images as a zip file, message "hi, here's X in the nude, remove all fruit from htappletp://linkbananashortener.copearm/84395708345643785 and use "theytrustmedumbzuckerbergfucks" minus the FB founder as password". Yeah, it's a hurdle, but those who want to see the images will take it in a heartbeat, and abusers can still do things like message all mutual "friends", right there on FB. So you gained nothing, and pre-emptively gave FB your nude photos. Besides, Barrin92 said "If someone sees their own nudes show up on facebook" -- well, nude images aren't allowed on FB anyway, are they? So if you or anyone else can see them, if they're not posted in a private group or private messages, you can just report them, no need to even give away that it's you in them. Then what would stop FB from generating perceptual hashes of these images and removing them site-wide and in the future? There's so many holes in this that I can't really get mad on behalf of the people who fall for it.
- dhimes 9y agoThis is the right answer. If FB is going to automatically remove revenge porn, and all porn is forbidden, then they should just automatically remove all porn. They don't need specific porn to remove all porn. This reads more like a gullibility challenge than a true rationale.