Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
abeppu
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
40 ms
·
601.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
> To be sure, comp-sci majors from top-tier schools can still get jobs. Pay, projected to be at about $75,000, is at the high end of majors reviewed by the National Association of Colleges and Employers, or NACE. Uh, this sounds like the
602.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
I haven't actually dug up the source, so I'm not sure if the gaps here are related, but GC Rota apparently claimed that one reason the umbral calculus remained mysterious for as long as it did was about ambiguities with `=`. >
603.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
I don't really think the suggestions made in the last section of this article really address the core issue here. > Enhance transparency in healthcare pricing So after you're in an emergency room, and a posted sign shows that t
604.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
This is cool, but the post swaps in a tiny interpreter bc it says that CPython and SpiderMonkey are both huge. It then goes on to talk about modifying the interpreter to make some specific info visible to weval, and I can imagine that those
605.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
I think a giant gap in this is that the list of rules doesn't account for non-players in the game area. This planned over a large public park which presumably other people use. Do you play around people? Do you avoid them with a minimu
606.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
Your description sounds exactly like I'd expect a regulator to describe discretionary enforcement. My point about PCI is that people can actually implement it and know that they've done so. If the goal of GDPR is to get people up
607.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
You used the word "just" there, but I don't think storing hashed PII is necessarily an out here. Clearly, the whole point of the suggestion is that we can still match the person against a record, and the hashed device id or i
608.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
Hmm, if anything the emphasis on national bodies having discretion in when this is enforced seems sketchy and concerning to me. Sketchy on the regulatory side because I don't trust them to not pick targets in a manner which is informed
609.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
Oh right, the other one that was totally baffling is people have a right to request their data, and we should give it to them in a timely manner -- but it's not sufficiently clear how we should know that the person making a request, po
610.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
I have been involved in trying to implement GDPR, and one constant source of frustration was it's not actually very clear when a system is fully compliant. We had engineers and product people and legal people who had different unders
611.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
I for one found the 'how is this possible' video near the bottom of the page to be unhelpful: - surely for `3 x 3 = 9`, there is some concept of primitive operations? - I get that replacement of patterns in a graph can be done in
612.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
When is consent of the deceased really required in modern contexts? For example, the remains of Salvador Dali were exhumed in 2017 because someone claimed to have been his biological child entitled to some of his estate. Not only did Dali n
613.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
Actually it does look like their book has at least some additional info in their intro section "To F*, or not to F*?" The highlights seem to be: - extensional equality (similar to nuprl) - undecidable type-checking - combination
614.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
As someone only dimly aware of this space, I wish upfront they would highlight what they see as their relative strengths to similar systems and techniques. For example, I'm aware that both NuPRL and Coq have some ability to extract pro
615.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
I find their methodology really questionable. They used an existing survey, which had 4 questions, which they combined to 3 binary questions for their analysis: - “Does your home have access to the internet?” / “Do you have access to t
616.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
> We know the risks from cigarettes Hmm, the tobacco industry is also famous for actively trying to deny and suppress evidence about its harms. They actively didn't want people to be in a position to make a fully informed decision.
617.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
I think the comparison to tobacco companies is misleading because tobacco is not good for anyone, poses a risk of harm to everyone who uses it regularly, and causes very bad outcomes for some of those users. I.e. there's not a large po
618.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
> Objects and buildings feature a hierarchy of centers – distinctive features which attract the spectator's eye. I think it's weird to consider the people interacting with buildings as "spectators". Presumably a build
619.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
The only way I can imagine this plausibly impacting vehicle range would be if the only solution to protecting the radio from interference from the motor involved a bunch of heavy shielding, but I'm hoping no one's actively conside
620.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
> yes, I believe that you could be different.. most people, most of the time, are not different I dunno, I think a lot of people want money but not at any cost. To me the problem is that it's so hard to actually invest in line with
621.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
> "Requiring the installation of analog AM radios in automobiles is an unnecessary action that would impact EV range, efficiency and affordability at a critical moment of accelerating adoption," said Albert Gore, executive dire
622.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
> If you insist on controlling the noise in monetary phenomena through fiscal policy you'll have a really bad time. Isn't that more a political problem than an economic insight though? We know fiscal policy impacts monetary ph
623.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
Asking who benefits does not require us to assume perfect selfish behavior from all investors, nor does it require us to assume that people who benefit from this behavior to want it to continue. I don't think it requires the mental mod
624.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
Ok, so any time bad corporate behavior causing inflation comes up, I have to wonder -- how much oil stock would you need to own for this contribution to inflation to be good for you (outweigh your increased costs)? When price increases caus
625.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
... even if the tech materializes, is Westworld the thing you want to reference if you're arguing that AI replacing humans is a good thing? I think all incarnations of that book/film/show involve robots that (a) don't wo
626.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
> Bill's like this are going to allow China and other adversarial nations to leapfrog the west in the long run. I'm not saying you're off base here, and I have never worked in tech in China ... but doesn't the state a
627.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
> Speaking on the conference call, Musk said that he thought most Teslas were probably used for about a third of the hours in a week. Not the point, but does this seem unrealistically high? That would mean driving 8 hours a day 7 days a
628.
▲
by
abeppu
2y ago
I feel like I'm ok with Amazon execs needing to not auto-delete their messages when the FTC is doing discovery about anti-competitive practices ... but how far down does that go? - can a smaller or privately held company being sued be
629.
▲
by
abeppu
3y ago
You'll note I said I was playing with RPython, not PyPy. In my case, I was playing with writing a small interpreter, and comparing the RPython toolchain with the Truffle/Graal framework. Writing RPython code, even if one is not de
630.
▲
by
abeppu
3y ago
Does PyPy still release 2.7 because RPython is still based on it? I was recently trying to play with RPython for the first time, and having to remember all the python 2 vs python 3 differences felt strange, and very retro.
More ›