2 ms·
I feel like I'm ok with Amazon execs needing to not auto-delete their messages when the FTC is doing discovery about anti-competitive practices ... but how far
by abeppu 2y ago
I feel like I'm ok with Amazon execs needing to not auto-delete their messages when the FTC is doing discovery about anti-competitive practices ... but how far down does that go?
- can a smaller or privately held company being sued be obligated to keep all their communications in a form which can be subpoenaed?
- is a family business being sued under the same obligation? What if execs in that family business have both personal and business conversations?
- is an individual being sued under the same obligation?
- if I want access to someone's personal messages, can I contrive a reason to sue them, and create such an obligation to deliver personal correspondence to my counsel?
- if Senator McCarthy thinks you're maybe a communist, can he publish your name as part of a list of suspicious persons and provide legal funds for to any wannabe vigilante who can contrive a suit against you?
At some point, I think we as a society need to agree on what rights to privacy exist, how solid they are, which rights are enjoyed by individuals and which rights if any also apply to corporations.
- j33zusjuice 2y ago> for months after the feds notified Amazon of the antitrust investigation. That’s the problem. Had they always used signal—-even if they had started the day before the notice of investigation was sent—-it’s a non-issue. They did it in response to a notice. That’s shady shit.
- stefan_ 2y agoWell its certainly not going to be privacy rights for corporations, seeing how there also seems to be no legal repercussions for them. But I think you are just overall missing the entire point: these people were notified that they are recordkeepers.