aayushwhiz

2 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by aayushwhiz 2y ago

   In response to the second part, this project is a part of the Open LLM Initiative, which also has projects like the Global LLM Challenge. We are also planning to push this project into a consortium once it gains some traction, and we are cu
2. 2.▲
   by aayushwhiz 2y ago

   Thank you so much for the feedback about the location of the comparison box, I have merged a change that moves it up higher in the readme.
3. 3.▲
   by aayushwhiz 2y ago

   Yeah, I can completely see this, the goal of this was to be specifically for the messages object, and not a completions object, since in my experience, you usually send messages from front end to backend and then create the completion reque
4. 4.▲
   by aayushwhiz 2y ago

   I see, thank you for the feedback, I will do a brainstorm on the name, I originally thought that open message format seemed somewhat catchy, but I can totally see how it is generic and not as descriptive as it should be.
5. 5.▲
   by aayushwhiz 2y ago

   Hi, do you think it would be beneficial to specify that it is for LLM interaction within the name itself?
6. 6.▲
   Show HN: Open Message Format – a compact, vendor-agnostic spec for messages(github.com)

   32 points by aayushwhiz 2y ago|16 comments
7. 7.▲
   by aayushwhiz 2y ago

   Open Message Format (OMF) is a specification for structuring message exchanges between users, servers, and large language models (LLMs). It defines an API contract and schema for the "message" object, which supports communication