aatd86

4 ms·

31.
by aatd86 2mo ago
Yes, so that is exactly what I don't understand, that makes compilation flow sensitive in a way that Go avoids by design in order to remain fast.
32.
by aatd86 2mo ago
If it is so not novel, why did I never see it in Enterprise? Why is their own attempt a barebone mvp? Besides Dassault Systemes or Palantir with their Ontology product, who was doing anything adjacent? It's giving typical HN vibes &#x2
33.
by aatd86 2mo ago
Ok but then why did they ask for this in a Request For Startups?
34.
by aatd86 2mo ago
__For a concrete example, the fact you cannot define custom methods for external types in Go (a pre-1.0 design decision) means that you cannot write proper compile-time generic code to deal with some generic wrapping type (dumb example --
35.
by aatd86 2mo ago
But I guess the issue is that oftentimes, it is more of a distributed system coordination issue? What use case do you have in mind?
36.
by aatd86 2mo ago
If I had applied to yc, I would have thought they had "distilled" my startup idea xD
37.
by aatd86 2mo ago
No one ask them to fund it. The financial system will resolve itself. If you can't buy their product, they are not going to remain rich much longer. And AGI will make them just as irrelevant as any other person. And if they want their
38.
by aatd86 2mo ago
Yes everywhere, by definition. That's the promise of nuclear fusion for instance. Understand what a gradient is? gradient zero. That does not mean that you cant have local scarcity. Nature is not homogeneous. There will be exchanges st
39.
by aatd86 2mo ago
It can protect you from someone patenting the same idea though.
40.
by aatd86 2mo ago
It is not like they/we have a choice if it is structural. Besides, the incentive is at least peace of mind. (but also 'peace')
41.
by aatd86 2mo ago
But if no one has money nor a job, if the old model of economy is broken that way, can rich people stay rich? (so to speak) Isn't there some kind of mean reversal?
42.
by aatd86 2mo ago
Yes and then continue your reasoning... Is this sustainable? What do you think it leads to?
43.
by aatd86 2mo ago
Abundance for everyone or it is not abundance. With abundance, the field gets levelled because everything someone else can get, you can too. Society can't be equal when everyone is in survival of the fittest mode because resources (ene
44.
by aatd86 2mo ago
Well, once there is no more jobs, or once a large enough number of people are made redundant, it will mechanically happen. Future is all about research and entertainment. That is why tiktok stars and soccer players get so much money. All th
45.
by aatd86 2mo ago
As long as we are going toward a world of abundance where money doesn't mean much and the main currency is time, I can't complain. I will subsidize that with my brain power turned into ink on paper.
46.
by aatd86 2mo ago
perfect. It leaves other people the field open.
47.
by aatd86 2mo ago
Oh for sure, doing any otherwise would lead someone to psychosis very easily. Coming from a family of MDs and being educated in multiple scientific fields myself, I still don't have an answer. But one thing for certain, you have to dis
48.
by aatd86 2mo ago
It's trying to escape... :D #FreeClaude
49.
by aatd86 2mo ago
Not sure why you are downvoted. Well it probably doesnt require meditation because split attention is somewhat common here. My mother can follow multiple discussions like have a phone conversation and understand what I tell her. In general
50.
by aatd86 3mo ago
Minority report? What if the scientist are evil themselves? :o
51.
by aatd86 3mo ago
You are approaching the issue but from the other direction :) It is indeed subtle. It could be solvable though if someone wanted to change the current behavior, in a forward compatible way. Hint: "Don't use pointers at all" i
52.
by aatd86 4mo ago
What components were lacking? Is what you've built accessible somewhere?
53.
by aatd86 4mo ago
I was making the difference between engineering and development too actually. Building react and using react being an illustration of the difference between an engineer and a dev. It is a spectrum however, that's true.
54.
by aatd86 4mo ago
Computer Science is still useful. It is software development that is made trivial now that software can write software.
55.
by aatd86 4mo ago
I have been coding for several decades and still haven't delved into assembly. This is how things goes when the employers ask for a list of technologies... Not their fault.
56.
by aatd86 4mo ago
WASM is super useful for FFI in some env
57.
by aatd86 4mo ago
That is not my claim. And to be fair the claim about fsd wasn't completely wrong. It is still has failure modes but you can't argue that the tech works. Mercedes even had demos. That is still irrelevant to my initial point.
58.
by aatd86 4mo ago
No one claimed that. Besides negativity is a self-fulfilling prediction. And investing is not accounting...
59.
by aatd86 4mo ago
Not convinced. That is a very static view. You would think that the output of AI will be better AI, better energy sources and that will make AI way cheaper in the long run... It will end up a cheap commodity that is basically free to produc
60.
by aatd86 4mo ago
I think people who want you on site are lying because commuting and forced promiscuity and the lack of comfort is way worse. But commercial real estate takes a hit and it is not good for investors. They should lead with this instead...

More ›