aashiq

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by aashiq 3y ago

   It depends! There should probably also be a process by which reviewers themselves get graded. Then paper writers can choose whether to splurge for fewer really amazing reviewers, or a larger quantity of mediocre reviewers. Also, readers wil
2. 2.▲
   by aashiq 6y ago

   I 100% agree with you, and to dismiss web apps in this way is to devalue making thinking easier for people. However, I'm also amused by the Freudian slip of 1 second to 1000 ms, which would of course be "tech" instead of tech
3. 3.▲
   by aashiq 6y ago

   Being right on average isn't that useful for intellectuals. Much harder to be right even once about something important that others are very wrong about. It's easy to be right on average by always following the prevailing consensu
4. 4.▲
   by aashiq 7y ago

   I'm not sure it's working for tone 1. I played back the teacher's recording and it thought it was tone 3. i was able to get 2,3,4 right though, and i think it probably helped my tone2