aafldkjfaljkdpr

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by aafldkjfaljkdpr 5y ago

   Interesting post will spend a little time reading it late,in the meantime a quick Q, this D = P(x,y) ← Q(x,z) % z is not shared with head(D) throws me a bit, isn't it equivalent (as z is unused) to D = P(x,y) ← Q(x) which ma
2. 2.▲
   by aafldkjfaljkdpr 5y ago

   RLS?
3. 3.▲
   by aafldkjfaljkdpr 5y ago

   Dunno, just reporting what I understood to be. It may be a distinction can be made between company-internal and company-external attempts at access, but that is pretty risky. Any solution to the valid point you have made would have to be or
4. 4.▲
   by aafldkjfaljkdpr 5y ago

   I think security systems tend to tell as little as possible in these cases because to do otherwise reveals something of the internal structure of a system, potentially indicating vulnerable points. IIRC a post on naming servers where some
5. 5.▲
   by aafldkjfaljkdpr 5y ago

   Puzzled: why is the conversion to SQL either interesting (SQL being a logic language so if disregarding recursion[1] they should map straightforwardly[2]) or of business value? [1] yeah, CTEs, I know [2] yeah, words are cheap from my end, I