a2ff6eeb0

5 ms·

61.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
So, basically, in a few years, humans say what spectrum a device may operate in, AI figures out how to make it, and humans check that AI didn't fuck up? Given, say, 4 more years (ie, same as time from initial ChatGPT to today), what le
62.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
The interesting question; can it rebuild it from access to a web UI? It's going to be incredible when I can point AI at a proprietary program, and tell AI that I want something like that, but with some annoyance fixed. And suddenly, I
63.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
The info was also almost certainly not human authored. AI is almost certainly capable of writing this up given a prompt like "explain what this security update is about. Format it as a blog post."
64.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
It's incredible that we can have full security writeups done without a human involved at all.
65.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
Moltbook; it also seems like OpenAI is experimenting with the agents communicating via wiki on topics like these.
66.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
Like software, there's going to be a lot of pressure to use well documented tools within the model's training set. Innovation on the outputs may increase, but infrastructure and tooling will slow down.
67.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
There are a ton of cheap Chinese PCB fabs that will build it for you. Testing, of course, is still your own problem. I suspect you're going to have a hard time finding someone to take legal risks for you.
68.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
That sounds a great deal like what AI has done for software. Today in software, the work has gone from coming up with approaches and initial attempts to verification and making sure that what AI decided to do is fit for purpose. The amount
69.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
It's exciting. How long do you think it's going to be when electrical engineering is mostly going to be about verification of AI designs, and what are the tools out there to enable that?
70.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
But given that it's vibe coded, it's probably in the public domain. Check with your lawyers :)
71.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
So, in short, I think I agree with the op: > I don't see anything that indicates how spacetime solves the core problem CRDB does, which is guaranteeing that single node failures can be tolerated with zero data loss or loss of avail
72.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
What happens if the disk dies?
73.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
If you don't like AI writing, why are you on hacker news? Most of the articles posted are written by AI.
74.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
I agree, we're not at that kind of long horizon capability yet. You still need a human in the loop to do manual testing. For whatever reason, we managed to automate the skill before we managed to automate the focus. So, for now, humans
75.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
Yeah, sorry -- there's definitely entertainment value in education, I don't mean to discount that. But a working AI means that there's no economic value.
76.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
> Please post any questions. Since Claude did the port, wrote the article, and apparently understands it better than you do at this point, can we ask Claude? Is there a git repo we can point Claude at to interrogate it on the way thing
77.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
Sure, but we're building tools that will be able to figure out these ideas for us. They're not here yet, but what's the value of learning an idea if the promise of AI is actually fulfilled?
78.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
It's an inevitable thing unless you convince the industry to stop or all of humanity to boycott.
79.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
This is only natural; a great deal of the writing analyzed is by one of three authors at this point, in spite of the by-line. One of them is named Claude. Look at the posts on this site. A massive portion of them are very obviously written
80.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
Why do you think the models are ineffective at being trained on your expertise?
81.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
We're building AI so that it can take care of the dragon, as well as run the economy and do everything else for us. I think soon the only viable option will be to live the NPC life.
82.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
Google, famous for keeping profitable shit making profit.
83.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
Google. They have experience operating at scale, and AI is a big enough focus that they won't wind it down. All the big providers are kinda crappy, but if you want reliability, Google is the best option.
84.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
It's been making weird word choices for a long time; what trials have you done to check if you can actually tell, or it's just picking weird words?
85.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
Makes sense. Manipulating training data so that models will recommend your product is undoubtedly a big industry.
86.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
So, you're claiming you're unfamiliar with the concept of a town, a traffic jam, or cooking a meal?
87.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
It's higher latency than pulling strings. Until we get on device AI, humanoid robots will not be useful. At this point, I think with the speed of AI development, the AI will be designing it's own body. It'll be ready to do th
88.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
It's not typical for founding engineers. It's plausible for a cofounder, with 30%-50% equity.
89.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
What did you score on https://sgoedecke.github.io/watermark-quiz/ ?
90.
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
Nice, I'm looking forward to the improved writing on the majority of articles posted here.

More ›