4 ms·
This is only natural; a great deal of the writing analyzed is by one of three authors at this point, in spite of the by-line. One of them is named Claude. Look
by a2ff6eeb0 1mo ago
This is only natural; a great deal of the writing analyzed is by one of three authors at this point, in spite of the by-line. One of them is named Claude.
Look at the posts on this site. A massive portion of them are very obviously written by AI.
As AI gets better, I expect fewer people will do the toil of writing.
- nozzlegear 1mo ago> As AI gets better, I expect fewer people will do the toil of writing. I do it just for the love of the game
- lelanthran 1mo ago> As AI gets better, I expect fewer people will do the toil of writing. Sure, but you can replace `writing` with `thinking`, and it would still be correct. The question is whether this is a bad thing or a good thing.
- a2ff6eeb0 1mo agoIt's an inevitable thing unless you convince the industry to stop or all of humanity to boycott.
- jplusequalt 1mo ago>The question is whether this is a bad thing or a good thing. Framing this as a debate worth having gives people who would argue on the side of "it's a good thing" a platform. We should not be giving people who would argue for the death of thinking a platform.