a1369209993

286 ms·

2491.
by a1369209993 7y ago
> The problem I see Come to think of it, that also breaks option escaping in glob et al: ./--kill=everything vs --kill=everything@.
2492.
by a1369209993 7y ago
Unless you mean that you don't find the pigs on Instagram entertaining, I don't see your point. Clearly there is no grave shortage of food pigs if you're eating one, so the marginal benifit of having a few extra food pigs is
2493.
by a1369209993 7y ago
More to the point, they correctly perceive that that specific small group of people are acting on behalf of a evil corporation, rather than based on a coherent vision of what a successful language should look like.
2494.
by a1369209993 7y ago
That's a entirely reasonable position; those pigs are more useful as entertainment than food, by a rather large margin too.
2495.
by a1369209993 7y ago
I think it's more like saying that there's no meaningful sense in which your body, apart from your pancreas, makes decisions about how much insulin your pancreas secretes. It is technically true, just... only technically.
2496.
by a1369209993 7y ago
[Setting aside the overwhelming likehood that you are lying, mistaken, or other not genuine in your hypothetical offer.] If you offer me (1G$/50yr=) 20 million dollars a year to spend eight hours a day trying to find a solution to th
2497.
by a1369209993 7y ago
> If they heavily push something for a task that clearly has no reason to require that something then it's probably fishy. See also ninety-plus percent of existing javascript, and literally the entire existence of intel management e
2498.
by a1369209993 7y ago
Actually, that could still work: > in<TAB> index.html@. init.sh@.. index.html@foobar@.. ... inputrc@etc@/ The problem I see is this makes it hard to have domain-specific or optional address interpretation. Eg
2499.
by a1369209993 7y ago
No, I'm saying that even if all the supervisors are bad, the ability to search for punishable behaviour only helps them if there exists punishable behaviour for them to find. I agree that this is a unreasonably high standard to hold pe
2500.
by a1369209993 7y ago
It would also be nice if browsers didn't by default auto-execute malware served by any random website, to the point that people think it isn't the website's fault that it breaks when said auto-execution is disabled.
2501.
by a1369209993 7y ago
If "punishable behaviour" is appropiately limited to things like assault and evidence planting, then this is irrelevant, and superior officers should even be required to preform such searches. If "punishable behaviour"
2502.
by a1369209993 7y ago
> The movie makers stop making movies because they won't make money on them. Counterexample: fanfiction.net 13'293'677 works archiveofourown.org 4'825'000 works fimfiction.net 125'797 works [assorted forums
2503.
by a1369209993 7y ago
Assuming the keys are Hash + Ord, wouldn't that just be: for (k,v) in &src { dst.insert(k,v); } ?
2504.
by a1369209993 7y ago
Or if you need to write it down anywhere at all; that's why programmers use eN or e+N. Although we really need to get around to standardizing a hexadecimal equivalent.
2505.
by a1369209993 7y ago
Actually, it should be grams. 51.3162(...) grams, to be somewhat precise.
2506.
by a1369209993 7y ago
To be fair, I suspect RussianCow would write that as something like: mat3x3( rowvec3( 0, a, b), rowvec3(-a, 0, c), rowvec3( b,-c, 0), ) Which is probably better, especially with tuples instead of struct{Scalar[3]}. Do
2507.
by a1369209993 7y ago
Sorry, should have clarified: my example was written in C[0][1]; cmplt is something like (Dtyp* ,Dval* ,Dtyp* ,Dval* ), which is what I was alluding to with "just need a type checker". Also, in the code I anonymised that from, cmp
2508.
by a1369209993 7y ago
No, we can't. My (and, by the sound of it, CrLf's) favorite format relies on information that your pre-commit hook has artificially removed from the code. Eg: munge(gidget, thing1,thing2,thing3); cmplt(dtypeA,valueA,
2509.
by a1369209993 8y ago
> The value of life is not infinite. Technically it is[0], but they're going to die in a century or so (if that) anyway, so anything that reduces quality of life enough is morally equivalent to killing them earlier. 0: at least to w
2510.
by a1369209993 8y ago
I'm not sure there is one, but the fact that something is the least bad option available doesn't make it not bad.
2511.
by a1369209993 8y ago
If you can convince Honda to do the work, then yes[0]. You could also go a local mechanic[0]. It is literally not possible for Microsoft et al or a independent programmer to sell you iPhone apps[1]. 0: I'm assuming Ford hasn't add
2512.
by a1369209993 8y ago
Actually, I think you could pare it down to choose { cases... } using https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/mp/ techniques.
2513.
by a1369209993 8y ago
Also, you shouldn't use a different hash algorithm for HMAC than for other hashing, because that increases the amount of security-critical code you have, which directly increases the chance that there's a bug in your security-crit
2514.
by a1369209993 8y ago
The problem with that is return doesn't evaluate to anything, so there's no (return foo).bar expressions to benefit from that change. Same problem with break, continue, and goto, for that matter.
2515.
by a1369209993 8y ago
> it coopts the field access syntax [...] for a purpose entirely orthogonal to field access You mean like C++'s a.this_method_is_a_function_call(...) did? Not to be confused with a.function_pointer_field(...), despite having literal
2516.
by a1369209993 8y ago
I think part of the problem is that it'sn't visually obvious that ? and especially : are lower precedence than < and >. I suspect that most of the people with genuine objections would feel better about: a<b ? -1 : a&g
2517.
by a1369209993 8y ago
> This is a mistake, an easily recoverable one , and is not intentional or malicious. While I agree with most of your comment, you're downplaying the severity here, especially since, IIUC, this situation also affected the Tor brows
2518.
by a1369209993 8y ago
I think it's same phenomenon that benefitted Google pre-turning-evil. Redditors - and most other netizens - hate corporations for their actions and shared values, so if you make a big show of shitting all over one stereotypical corpora
2519.
by a1369209993 8y ago
Er, yes, that's exactly my point.
2520.
by a1369209993 8y ago
Link is broken; gives fraudulent error message: > We've detected unusual activity from your computer network > To continue, please click the box below to let us know you're not a robot. Does anyone have a link to the actual

More ›