a-nom-a-ly

4 ms·

1.
by a-nom-a-ly 11y ago
I'm not sure what you're trying to say. This is, IMO, nothing more than a lack of understanding. Is the result of `a := make([]struct{}, 0, 1); b := a; b = append(b, struct{}{}); println(len(a), len(b))` also surprising?
2.
by a-nom-a-ly 11y ago
You seem to be confusing `array` with `slice`. AFAIK, append always returns a new slice. How could it not, when everything is copy/pass by value? A slice is essentially a struct with fields for len, cap and a pointer to an array.
3.
by a-nom-a-ly 13y ago
Well, these arguments of yours aren't the most ridiculous I've ever heard... I'll give you that much.
4.
by a-nom-a-ly 13y ago
> It can not do bare metal programming or real time applications without major changes to the language standard. TIL that these are required for text editors and related tools.
5.
by a-nom-a-ly 13y ago
> If you cant learn anything else pretty sure you havent the skills to program any "embedded device". How did you arrive at this conclusion?
6.
by a-nom-a-ly 13y ago
# pgrep nginx #
7.
by a-nom-a-ly 13y ago
This behavior is disgusting in ways I cannot begin to describe. You didn't even attempt to do anything helpful, and probably didn't even read the post you responded to. To others: don't waste your time clicking on this link,
8.
by a-nom-a-ly 13y ago
Where did you hear about this? because this is the first I'm hearing about it... don't be so selfish.
9.
by a-nom-a-ly 13y ago
> In the real world the only person who always has your back isyou. In context of this post, from personal experience, I can tell you only one thing: This is almost never true.
10.
by a-nom-a-ly 13y ago
You can do this just as easily in Go as well, using reflection.
11.
by a-nom-a-ly 13y ago
Adding `::` just to separate package namespace adds nothing useful IMO; just more noise and one more needless concept. If I decided to re-use the package name more than once it'd be `list1, list2` I guess it's probably a programmi
12.
by a-nom-a-ly 13y ago
(Can't reply to your post below) > I edited that part of the comment out because it was not really related to anything, but I meant that all identifiers go into a single namespace, e.g if you have a package called bytes you can&#x27
13.
by a-nom-a-ly 13y ago
You might have a point regarding binary blobs but, IMO, if they can alter text(comments, source, etc.) in such a way that it's not obvious to the human reviewer, then they deserve to succeed. I don't know what `unused files` means
14.
by a-nom-a-ly 13y ago
Including those who make and enforce the laws.
15.
by a-nom-a-ly 13y ago
> you really just need a shell script that sets GOPATH No. :|
16.
by a-nom-a-ly 13y ago
> Doesnt the GPL and other free licenses state it has to be available together with the binaries? Have you read them? No.
17.
by a-nom-a-ly 13y ago
Out of curiosity, do you mind explaining why you think it's unprofessional? > Won't it piss off iOS users, who are not responsible for Apple's bad practices? In many(most?) services abuse of the service is met with suspens
18.
by a-nom-a-ly 13y ago
> Those that want to get money with the free work of others, should give something back and most authors do offer commercial licenses when asked for. Have you ever considered the fact that it's not all about money and proprietary
19.
The Benchmark with Go REST API Server(blog.stanaka.org)
5 points by a-nom-a-ly 13y ago|0 comments